REVIEW 1 cited by
Using Neural Networks for Data Cleaning in Weather Datasets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Using Neural Networks for Data Cleaning in Weather Datasets
read the original abstract
In climate science, we often want to compare across different datasets. Difficulties can arise in doing this due to inevitable mismatches that arise between observational and reanalysis data, or even between different reanalyses. This misalignment can raise problems for any work that seeks to make inferences about one dataset from another. We considered tropical cyclone location as an example task with one dataset providing atmospheric conditions (ERA5) and another providing storm tracks (IBTrACS). We found that while the examples often aligned well, there were a considerable proportion (around 25%) which were not well aligned. We trained a neural network to map from the wind field to the storm location; in this setting misalignment in the datasets appears as "label noise" (i.e. the labelled storm location does not correspond to the underlying wind field). We found that this neural network trained only on the often noisy labels from IBTrACS had a denoising effect, and performed better than the IBTrACS labels themselves, as measured by human preferences. Remarkably, this even held true for training points, on which we might have expected the network to overfit to the IBTrACS predictions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Deep Learning for CMB Foreground Removal and Beam Deconvolution: A U-Net GAN Approach
A U-Net GAN reconstructs CMB T and E maps from Planck-like simulations with foregrounds and systematics, achieving under 1% error outside the Galactic region and demonstrating first-time correction for non-circular be...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.