Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SoK: Attacks on DAOs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.15071 v2 pith:WOG7MCMM submitted 2024-06-21 cs.CR cs.CY

classification cs.CRcs.CY
keywords attacksdaosdecentralizedvulnerabilitiesauditsgovernancemanyorganizations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are blockchain-based organizations that facilitate decentralized governance. Today, DAOs not only hold billions of dollars in their treasury but also govern many of the most popular Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocols. This paper systematically analyses security threats to DAOs, focusing on the types of attacks they face. We study attacks on DAOs that took place in the past, attacks that have been theorized to be possible, and potential attacks that were uncovered and prevented in audits. For each of these (potential) attacks, we describe and categorize the attack vectors utilized into four categories. This reveals that while many attacks on DAOs take advantage of the less tangible and more complex human nature involved in governance, audits tend to focus on code and protocol vulnerabilities. Thus, additionally, the paper examines empirical data on DAO vulnerabilities, outlines risk factors contributing to these attacks, and suggests mitigation strategies to safeguard against such vulnerabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets

    cs.CR 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Claims two forms of Polymarket arbitrage and $40 million extracted profit, but the body text provided is an unrelated plasma physics paper.

  2. Rollback-Free Cross-Chain Atomicity Through Forward-Only Correction

    cs.CR 2026-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A design sketch proposes journal-and-compensate atomicity for cross-chain contracts, with no formal model, proofs, or prototype.

  3. Towards Secure and Trustworthy DAOs for Cross-Chain Governance

    cs.CR 2026-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a layered, unvalidated security architecture for cross-chain DAO governance, folding known attacks and known cryptographic primitives into a new module diagram.

Pith tools