REVIEW 2 cited by
On Naive Mean-Field Approximation for high-dimensional canonical GLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study the validity of the Naive Mean Field (NMF) approximation for canonical GLMs with product priors. This setting is challenging due to the non-conjugacy of the likelihood and the prior. Using the theory of non-linear large deviations (Austin 2019, Chatterjee, Dembo 2016, Eldan 2018), we derive sufficient conditions for the tightness of the NMF approximation to the log-normalizing constant of the posterior distribution. As a second contribution, we establish that under minor conditions on the design, any NMF optimizer is a product distribution where each component is a quadratic tilt of the prior. In turn, this suggests novel iterative algorithms for fitting the NMF optimizer to the target posterior. Finally, we establish that if the NMF optimization problem has a "well-separated maximizer", then this optimizer governs the probabilistic properties of the posterior. Specifically, we derive credible intervals with average coverage guarantees, and characterize the prediction performance on an out-of-sample datapoint in terms of this dominant optimizer.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Variational Inference for Latent Variable Models in High Dimensions
The paper characterizes the exact regimes where mean-field variational inference is accurate for LDA and MMSB, with tight finite-sample KL bounds.
-
CLT in high-dimensional Bayesian linear regression with low SNR
In low-SNR high-dimensional Bayesian linear regression with product priors, one-dimensional posterior projections and the posterior mean are asymptotically Gaussian, centered at the mean-field approximation, with vari...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.