REVIEW 3 cited by
U Can't Gen This? A Survey of Intellectual Property Protection Methods for Data in Generative AI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Generative AI (GAI) models have the unparalleled ability to generate text, images, audio, and other forms of media that are increasingly indistinguishable from human-generated content. As these models often train on publicly available data, including copyrighted materials, art and other creative works, they inadvertently risk violating copyright and misappropriation of intellectual property (IP). Due to the rapid development of generative AI technology and pressing ethical considerations from stakeholders, protective mechanisms and techniques are emerging at a high pace but lack systematisation. In this paper, we study the concerns regarding the intellectual property rights of training data and specifically focus on the properties of generative models that enable misuse leading to potential IP violations. Then we propose a taxonomy that leads to a systematic review of technical solutions for safeguarding the data from intellectual property violations in GAI.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
SAIF: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating the Risks of Generative AI in the Public Sector
SAIF is a proposed framework that generates multimodal test prompts from a risk taxonomy, jailbreak tricks, and prompt styles to evaluate generative AI risks in the public sector.
-
CopyrightMeter: Revisiting Copyright Protection in Text-to-image Models
Most existing copyright protections for text-to-image models are not resilient to attacks, and the best protection depends on which priority, fidelity, efficacy, or resilience, matters most.
-
First-Place Solution to NeurIPS 2024 Invisible Watermark Removal Challenge
A competition-winning pipeline removes 95.7% of StegaStamp and TreeRing watermarks on the NeurIPS 2024 benchmark by combining VAE fine-tuning, diffusion purification, and translation tricks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.