Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Acoustic Feature Mixup for Balanced Multi-aspect Pronunciation Assessment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.15723 v1 pith:IICVHHVN submitted 2024-06-22 cs.CL cs.AIcs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.SDeess.AS
keywords acousticfeatureassessmentmixuppronunciationdatafeaturesspeech
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In automated pronunciation assessment, recent emphasis progressively lies on evaluating multiple aspects to provide enriched feedback. However, acquiring multi-aspect-score labeled data for non-native language learners' speech poses challenges; moreover, it often leads to score-imbalanced distributions. In this paper, we propose two Acoustic Feature Mixup strategies, linearly and non-linearly interpolating with the in-batch averaged feature, to address data scarcity and score-label imbalances. Primarily using goodness-of-pronunciation as an acoustic feature, we tailor mixup designs to suit pronunciation assessment. Further, we integrate fine-grained error-rate features by comparing speech recognition results with the original answer phonemes, giving direct hints for mispronunciation. Effective mixing of the acoustic features notably enhances overall scoring performances on the speechocean762 dataset, and detailed analysis highlights our potential to predict unseen distortions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Logit-Based GOP Scores for Mispronunciation Detection

    eess.AS 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Logit-based GOP scores, especially maximum logit, can improve correlation with human pronunciation ratings, but do not consistently beat probability-based GOP in classification.

Pith tools