The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2406.16020 · v5 · pith:424CCOXO · submitted 2024-06-23 · cs.SD · cs.CL· eess.AS

AudioBench: A Universal Benchmark for Audio Large Language Models

Reviewed by Pithpith:424CCOXOopen to challenge →

classification cs.SD cs.CLeess.AS
keywords audioaudiobenchaudiollmsbenchmarkdatasetsevaluationmodelsunderstanding
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We introduce AudioBench, a universal benchmark designed to evaluate Audio Large Language Models (AudioLLMs). It encompasses 8 distinct tasks and 26 datasets, among which, 7 are newly proposed datasets. The evaluation targets three main aspects: speech understanding, audio scene understanding, and voice understanding (paralinguistic). Despite recent advancements, there lacks a comprehensive benchmark for AudioLLMs on instruction following capabilities conditioned on audio signals. AudioBench addresses this gap by setting up datasets as well as desired evaluation metrics. Besides, we also evaluated the capabilities of five popular models and found that no single model excels consistently across all tasks. We outline the research outlook for AudioLLMs and anticipate that our open-sourced evaluation toolkit, data, and leaderboard will offer a robust testbed for future model developments.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PitchBench: Measuring Pitch Hearing in Audio-Language Models

    cs.SD 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PitchBench shows that frontier audio-language models have highly unreliable pitch perception across instruments, durations, noise levels, and formats.

  2. XModBench: Benchmarking Cross-Modal Capabilities and Consistency in Omni-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    XModBench is a tri-modal benchmark that systematically measures cross-modal consistency, modality disparities, and directional imbalances in omni-language models across five task families and all modality combinations.

  3. VoiceBench: Benchmarking LLM-Based Voice Assistants

    cs.CL 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VoiceBench is the first benchmark for multi-faceted evaluation of LLM voice assistants using real and synthetic spoken instructions with speaker, environmental, and content variations.

  4. REDDIT: Correcting Model-Generated Timestamp Drift in ASR without Forgetting via Replay-Based Distribution Editing

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    REDDIT corrects non-speech-induced timestamp drift in autoregressive ASR by editing timestamp targets under cached replay context while anchoring non-timestamp behavior to the frozen base distribution.

  5. All That Glitters Is Not Audio: Rethinking Text Priors and Audio Reliance in Audio-Language Evaluation

    cs.SD 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Audio-language models retain 60-72% of benchmark scores without audio, and most audio-dependent items can be solved from short fragments rather than full clips.

  6. GlobeAudio: A Multilingual Multicultural Benchmark for Naturalistic Evaluation of Large Audio-Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GlobeAudio is a new multilingual multicultural benchmark for naturalistic evaluation of large audio-language models, showing performance gaps especially for open-source models and low-resource languages.

  7. Afrispeech Semantics: Evaluating Audio Semantic Reasoning in Spoken Language Models Across Domains and Accents

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Audio language models are benchmarked on five semantic and paralinguistic reasoning tasks to reveal limitations in handling spoken audio evidence, accent variation, and domain shifts.

  8. On The Landscape of Spoken Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CL 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A literature survey that organizes spoken language models by architecture, training, and evaluation choices and identifies key challenges and future directions.