Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ALPBench: A Benchmark for Active Learning Pipelines on Tabular Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17322 v1 pith:FGVMSIVG submitted 2024-06-25 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords learningactivequerystrategiesalgorithmsalpbenchsettingsdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In settings where only a budgeted amount of labeled data can be afforded, active learning seeks to devise query strategies for selecting the most informative data points to be labeled, aiming to enhance learning algorithms' efficiency and performance. Numerous such query strategies have been proposed and compared in the active learning literature. However, the community still lacks standardized benchmarks for comparing the performance of different query strategies. This particularly holds for the combination of query strategies with different learning algorithms into active learning pipelines and examining the impact of the learning algorithm choice. To close this gap, we propose ALPBench, which facilitates the specification, execution, and performance monitoring of active learning pipelines. It has built-in measures to ensure evaluations are done reproducibly, saving exact dataset splits and hyperparameter settings of used algorithms. In total, ALPBench consists of 86 real-world tabular classification datasets and 5 active learning settings, yielding 430 active learning problems. To demonstrate its usefulness and broad compatibility with various learning algorithms and query strategies, we conduct an exemplary study evaluating 9 query strategies paired with 8 learning algorithms in 2 different settings. We provide ALPBench here: https://github.com/ValentinMargraf/ActiveLearningPipelines.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty Quantification with Proper Scoring Rules: Adjusting Measures to Prediction Tasks

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Uncertainty measures derived from proper scoring rules should be chosen to match the task loss; total uncertainty suits selective prediction, zero-one loss suits active learning.

Pith tools