REVIEW 1 cited by
Disce aut Deficere: Evaluating LLMs Proficiency on the INVALSI Italian Benchmark
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to generate and manipulate human language, highlighting their potential across various applications. Evaluating LLMs in languages other than English is crucial for ensuring their linguistic versatility, cultural relevance, and applicability in diverse global contexts, thus broadening their usability and effectiveness. We tackle this challenge by introducing a structured benchmark using the INVALSI tests, a set of well-established assessments designed to measure educational competencies across Italy. Our study makes three primary contributions: Firstly, we adapt the INVALSI benchmark for automated LLM evaluation, which involves rigorous adaptation of the test format to suit automated processing while retaining the essence of the original tests. Secondly, we provide a detailed assessment of current LLMs, offering a crucial reference point for the academic community. Finally, we visually compare the performance of these models against human results. Additionally, researchers are invited to submit their models for ongoing evaluation, ensuring the benchmark remains a current and valuable resource.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
An Empirical Investigation of Gender Stereotype Representation in Large Language Models: The Italian Case
In Italian, both ChatGPT (gpt-4o-mini) and Gemini (gemini-1.5-flash) associate higher-status professional roles with male pronouns and subordinate roles with female pronouns, e.g., 97-100% of 'she' responses pointed t...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.