Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MedMNIST-C: Comprehensive benchmark and improved classifier robustness by simulating realistic image corruptions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17536 v3 pith:7NIFY3ZQ submitted 2024-06-25 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords robustnessimagingbenchmarkchallengescorruptionsmedmnist-caugmentationcommunity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The integration of neural-network-based systems into clinical practice is limited by challenges related to domain generalization and robustness. The computer vision community established benchmarks such as ImageNet-C as a fundamental prerequisite to measure progress towards those challenges. Similar datasets are largely absent in the medical imaging community which lacks a comprehensive benchmark that spans across imaging modalities and applications. To address this gap, we create and open-source MedMNIST-C, a benchmark dataset based on the MedMNIST+ collection covering 12 datasets and 9 imaging modalities. We simulate task and modality-specific image corruptions of varying severity to comprehensively evaluate the robustness of established algorithms against real-world artifacts and distribution shifts. We further provide quantitative evidence that our simple-to-use artificial corruptions allow for highly performant, lightweight data augmentation to enhance model robustness. Unlike traditional, generic augmentation strategies, our approach leverages domain knowledge, exhibiting significantly higher robustness when compared to widely adopted methods. By introducing MedMNIST-C and open-sourcing the corresponding library allowing for targeted data augmentations, we contribute to the development of increasingly robust methods tailored to the challenges of medical imaging. The code is available at https://github.com/francescodisalvo05/medmnistc-api .

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An autonomous agent for auditing and improving the reliability of clinical AI models

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ModelAuditor is an LLM agent that audits clinical imaging models, selects metrics and shifts, proposes targeted augmentations, and recovers part of the performance lost under real-world distribution shifts.

  2. Beyond Overconfidence: Foundation Models Redefine Calibration in Deep Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Modern ImageNet foundation models are underconfident in-distribution, improve calibration under distribution shift, and only benefit from post-hoc calibration in-distribution.

  3. MoPET: Parameter-Efficient Mixture-of-Experts for Unified Medical Image Classification

    eess.IV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MoPET, a learned sparse router over low-rank LoRA/BOFT experts, reports higher average MedMNIST accuracy than isolated adapters (93.46% vs 92.83%) and boosts small targets with auxiliary data (83.58% vs 81.58%).

  4. On the Robustness of Medical Vision-Language Models: Are they Truly Generalizable?

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Medical vision-language models lose accuracy on corrupted images; RobustMedCLIP, a few-shot LoRA-tuned BioMedCLIP, partially restores robustness on the new MediMeta-C benchmark.

Pith tools