Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.18664 v4 pith:4O24NDKB submitted 2024-06-26 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords copyrightdatamethodsmodelmodelstakedowntrainingcontent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language models (LMs) derive their capabilities from extensive training on diverse data, including potentially copyrighted material. These models can memorize and generate content similar to their training data, posing potential concerns. Therefore, model creators are motivated to develop mitigation methods that prevent generating protected content. We term this procedure as copyright takedowns for LMs, noting the conceptual similarity to (but legal distinction from) the DMCA takedown This paper introduces the first evaluation of the feasibility and side effects of copyright takedowns for LMs. We propose CoTaEval, an evaluation framework to assess the effectiveness of copyright takedown methods, the impact on the model's ability to retain uncopyrightable factual knowledge from the training data whose recitation is embargoed, and how well the model maintains its general utility and efficiency. We examine several strategies, including adding system prompts, decoding-time filtering interventions, and unlearning approaches. Our findings indicate that no tested method excels across all metrics, showing significant room for research in this unique problem setting and indicating potential unresolved challenges for live policy proposals.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MATH-Perturb: Benchmarking LLMs' Math Reasoning Abilities against Hard Perturbations

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Hard perturbations that change the required solution method cause 10-25% accuracy drops across 18 LLMs on MATH, revealing limits in reasoning robustness.

  2. R-TOFU: Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    R-TOFU shows that answer-level unlearning is insufficient for large reasoning models because residual knowledge persists in chain-of-thought traces.

  3. DUSK: Do Not Unlearn Shared Knowledge

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DUSK benchmarks machine unlearning under overlapping forget and retain documents, showing existing methods remove surface text but fail to preserve shared knowledge while erasing unique content.

Pith tools