REVIEW 1 cited by
Near-Optimal Consistency-Robustness Trade-Offs for Learning-Augmented Online Knapsack Problems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper introduces a family of learning-augmented algorithms for online knapsack problems that achieve near Pareto-optimal consistency-robustness trade-offs through a simple combination of trusted learning-augmented and worst-case algorithms. Our approach relies on succinct, practical predictions -- single values or intervals estimating the minimum value of any item in an offline solution. Additionally, we propose a novel fractional-to-integral conversion procedure, offering new insights for online algorithm design.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Carbon- and Precedence-Aware Scheduling for Data Processing Clusters
A carbon-aware Spark scheduler that defers low-priority tasks during high-carbon periods, using importance scores from an ML scheduler, reduced carbon by roughly a third in a 100-node prototype with near-neutral end-t...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.