REVIEW 4 cited by
When Search Engine Services meet Large Language Models: Visions and Challenges
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Combining Large Language Models (LLMs) with search engine services marks a significant shift in the field of services computing, opening up new possibilities to enhance how we search for and retrieve information, understand content, and interact with internet services. This paper conducts an in-depth examination of how integrating LLMs with search engines can mutually benefit both technologies. We focus on two main areas: using search engines to improve LLMs (Search4LLM) and enhancing search engine functions using LLMs (LLM4Search). For Search4LLM, we investigate how search engines can provide diverse high-quality datasets for pre-training of LLMs, how they can use the most relevant documents to help LLMs learn to answer queries more accurately, how training LLMs with Learning-To-Rank (LTR) tasks can enhance their ability to respond with greater precision, and how incorporating recent search results can make LLM-generated content more accurate and current. In terms of LLM4Search, we examine how LLMs can be used to summarize content for better indexing by search engines, improve query outcomes through optimization, enhance the ranking of search results by analyzing document relevance, and help in annotating data for learning-to-rank tasks in various learning contexts. However, this promising integration comes with its challenges, which include addressing potential biases and ethical issues in training models, managing the computational and other costs of incorporating LLMs into search services, and continuously updating LLM training with the ever-changing web content. We discuss these challenges and chart out required research directions to address them. We also discuss broader implications for service computing, such as scalability, privacy concerns, and the need to adapt search engine architectures for these advanced models.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Taming the Chaos: Coordinated Autoscaling for Heterogeneous and Disaggregated LLM Inference
HeteroScale coordinates scaling of prefill and decode pools using decode TPS as a single robust signal, reporting a 26.6 percentage point GPU utilization gain in production.
-
SwiftSpec: Ultra-Low Latency LLM Decoding by Scaling Asynchronous Speculative Decoding
SwiftSpec uses asynchronous, disaggregated speculative decoding with parallel tree generation and fused kernels to speed up LLM decoding by 1.75x on average over baselines, reaching 348 tokens/s for Llama3-70B on 8 H800 GPUs.
-
Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning towards Multi-Step Multi-Source Search in Large Language Models
R-Search trains one LLM to reason, plan a multi-source search graph, and synthesize answers in a single pass, beating several search-augmented baselines.
-
Enhancing LLMs' Reasoning-Intensive Multimedia Search Capabilities through Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning
A two-stage fine-tuning and reinforcement-learning method makes LLMs generate token-efficient natural-language search plans, reporting strong accuracy gains on financial and news search benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.