REVIEW 3 cited by
Roleplay-doh: Enabling Domain-Experts to Create LLM-simulated Patients via Eliciting and Adhering to Principles
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Roleplay-doh: Enabling Domain-Experts to Create LLM-simulated Patients via Eliciting and Adhering to Principles
read the original abstract
Recent works leverage LLMs to roleplay realistic social scenarios, aiding novices in practicing their social skills. However, simulating sensitive interactions, such as in mental health, is challenging. Privacy concerns restrict data access, and collecting expert feedback, although vital, is laborious. To address this, we develop Roleplay-doh, a novel human-LLM collaboration pipeline that elicits qualitative feedback from a domain-expert, which is transformed into a set of principles, or natural language rules, that govern an LLM-prompted roleplay. We apply this pipeline to enable senior mental health supporters to create customized AI patients for simulated practice partners for novice counselors. After uncovering issues in GPT-4 simulations not adhering to expert-defined principles, we also introduce a novel principle-adherence prompting pipeline which shows 30% improvements in response quality and principle following for the downstream task. Via a user study with 25 counseling experts, we demonstrate that the pipeline makes it easy and effective to create AI patients that more faithfully resemble real patients, as judged by creators and third-party counselors. See our project website at https://roleplay-doh.github.io/ for code and data.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Simulating Couple Conflict: Designing A Multi-Agent System for Therapy Training and Practice
A stateful multi-agent system simulates demand-withdraw couple conflicts across six stages for therapist training and outperforms prompt-based baselines in realism and state detection.
-
Fairness Testing of Large Language Models in Role-Playing
Generates 550 roles and 33,000 questions to evaluate 10 LLMs in role-playing, finding 107,580 biased responses.
-
Inertia in Moral and Value Judgments of Large Language Models
LLMs exhibit persistent inertia in value orientations, with harm avoidance and fairness remaining skewed across persona prompts.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.