REVIEW 2 cited by
Improving Retrieval-augmented Text-to-SQL with AST-based Ranking and Schema Pruning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We focus on Text-to-SQL semantic parsing from the perspective of retrieval-augmented generation. Motivated by challenges related to the size of commercial database schemata and the deployability of business intelligence solutions, we propose $\text{ASTReS}$ that dynamically retrieves input database information and uses abstract syntax trees to select few-shot examples for in-context learning. Furthermore, we investigate the extent to which an in-parallel semantic parser can be leveraged for generating approximated versions of the expected SQL queries, to support our retrieval. We take this approach to the extreme--we adapt a model consisting of less than $500$M parameters, to act as an extremely efficient approximator, enhancing it with the ability to process schemata in a parallelised manner. We apply $\text{ASTReS}$ to monolingual and cross-lingual benchmarks for semantic parsing, showing improvements over state-of-the-art baselines. Comprehensive experiments highlight the contribution of modules involved in this retrieval-augmented generation setting, revealing interesting directions for future work.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SEFRQO: A Self-Evolving Fine-Tuned RAG-Based Query Optimizer
SEFRQO claims a self-evolving fine-tuned LLM with retrieval and execution feedback reduces query latency versus PostgreSQL, but the provided body is a different paper, blocking verification.
-
Exploring the Landscape of Text-to-SQL with Large Language Models: Progresses, Challenges and Opportunities
A systematic review organizing LLM-based text-to-SQL methods into pre-processing, in-context learning, fine-tuning, and post-processing paradigms, with a catalog of datasets, metrics, challenges, and future directions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.