Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Vision Mamba for Classification of Breast Ultrasound Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.03552 v2 pith:OTIWILD6 submitted 2024-07-04 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords mamba-basedmodelsvisionbreastdatasetultrasoundaveragebest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mamba-based models, VMamba and Vim, are a recent family of vision encoders that offer promising performance improvements in many computer vision tasks. This paper compares Mamba-based models with traditional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs) using the breast ultrasound BUSI dataset and Breast Ultrasound B dataset. Our evaluation, which includes multiple runs of experiments and statistical significance analysis, demonstrates that some of the Mamba-based architectures often outperform CNN and ViT models with statistically significant results. For example, in the B dataset, the best Mamba-based models have a 1.98\% average AUC and a 5.0\% average Accuracy improvement compared to the best non-Mamba-based model in this study. These Mamba-based models effectively capture long-range dependencies while maintaining some inductive biases, making them suitable for applications with limited data. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/anasiri/BU-Mamba}

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ControlMambaIR: Conditional Controls with State-Space Model for Image Restoration

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A diffusion image restoration model with a Mamba condition network reports low LPIPS/FID on several benchmarks, but the PSNR losses and internal inconsistencies undermine the stated performance claims.

Pith tools