REVIEW 3 cited by
Harnessing the Power of LLMs: Automating Unit Test Generation for High-Performance Computing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Unit testing is crucial in software engineering for ensuring quality. However, it's not widely used in parallel and high-performance computing software, particularly scientific applications, due to their smaller, diverse user base and complex logic. These factors make unit testing challenging and expensive, as it requires specialized knowledge and existing automated tools are often ineffective. To address this, we propose an automated method for generating unit tests for such software, considering their unique features like complex logic and parallel processing. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in coding and testing. We explored the capabilities of Davinci (text-davinci-002) and ChatGPT (gpt-3.5-turbo) in creating unit tests for C++ parallel programs. Our results show that LLMs can generate mostly correct and comprehensive unit tests, although they have some limitations, such as repetitive assertions and blank test cases.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
COFFE: A Code Efficiency Benchmark for Code Generation
A new benchmark, COFFE, uses stressful test cases and CPU instruction counts to show LLM-generated code is often correct but time-inefficient.
-
Generating Move Smart Contracts based on Concepts
A concept-based knowledge graph and iterative planning, coding, and debugging agents improve LLM-generated Move smart contracts, with reported relative gains up to 47 percent over baselines.
-
LogBabylon: A Unified Framework for Cross-Log File Integration and Analysis
The paper proposes an LLM+RAG framework for log parsing and analysis, but its evaluation contradicts the claimed performance gains.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.