Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A general framework for inexact splitting algorithms with relative errors and applications to Chambolle-Pock and Davis-Yin methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.05893 v2 pith:OUSEXVFU submitted 2024-07-08 math.OC

A general framework for inexact splitting algorithms with relative errors and applications to Chambolle-Pock and Davis-Yin methods

classification math.OC
keywords frameworkmethodmethodsproximalsplittingalgorithmsinexactallows
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work we apply the recently introduced framework of degenerate preconditioned proximal point algorithms to the hybrid proximal extragradient (HPE) method for maximal monotone inclusions. The latter is a method that allows inexact proximal (or resolvent) steps where the error is controlled by a relative-error criterion. Recently the HPE framework has been extended to the Douglas-Rachford method by Eckstein and Yao. In this paper we further extend the applicability of the HPE framework to splitting methods. To this end we use the framework of degenerate preconditioners that allows to write a large class of splitting methods as preconditioned proximal point algorithms. In this way, we modify many splitting methods such that one or more of the resolvents can be computed inexactly with an error that is controlled by an adaptive criterion. Further, we illustrate the algorithmic framework in the case of Chambolle-Pock's primal dual hybrid gradient method and the Davis-Yin's forward Douglas-Rachford method. In both cases, the inexact computation of the resolvent shows clear advantages in computing time and accuracy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.