Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Clinical Benchmark of Public Self-Supervised Pathology Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.06508 v3 pith:Z73NBHCX submitted 2024-07-09 eess.IV cs.CV

A Clinical Benchmark of Public Self-Supervised Pathology Foundation Models

classification eess.IV cs.CV
keywords modelsfoundationpathologyclinicaldatasetsdifferentpublicbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The use of self-supervised learning (SSL) to train pathology foundation models has increased substantially in the past few years. Notably, several models trained on large quantities of clinical data have been made publicly available in recent months. This will significantly enhance scientific research in computational pathology and help bridge the gap between research and clinical deployment. With the increase in availability of public foundation models of different sizes, trained using different algorithms on different datasets, it becomes important to establish a benchmark to compare the performance of such models on a variety of clinically relevant tasks spanning multiple organs and diseases. In this work, we present a collection of pathology datasets comprising clinical slides associated with clinically relevant endpoints including cancer diagnoses and a variety of biomarkers generated during standard hospital operation from two medical centers. We leverage these datasets to systematically assess the performance of public pathology foundation models and provide insights into best practices for training new foundation models and selecting appropriate pretrained models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Evaluating Computational Pathology Foundation Models for Prostate Cancer Grading under Distribution Shifts

    eess.IV 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Pathology foundation models deliver strong in-distribution prostate cancer grading performance but exhibit large drops under cross-site image appearance shifts while remaining relatively robust to label distribution shifts.