Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

GLBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.07457 v4 pith:GOVHP2LQ submitted 2024-07-10 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords graphllmmethodsbenchmarkglbenchmodelszero-shotbaselinescomprehensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized the way we interact with graphs, leading to a new paradigm called GraphLLM. Despite the rapid development of GraphLLM methods in recent years, the progress and understanding of this field remain unclear due to the lack of a benchmark with consistent experimental protocols. To bridge this gap, we introduce GLBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating GraphLLM methods in both supervised and zero-shot scenarios. GLBench provides a fair and thorough evaluation of different categories of GraphLLM methods, along with traditional baselines such as graph neural networks. Through extensive experiments on a collection of real-world datasets with consistent data processing and splitting strategies, we have uncovered several key findings. Firstly, GraphLLM methods outperform traditional baselines in supervised settings, with LLM-as-enhancers showing the most robust performance. However, using LLMs as predictors is less effective and often leads to uncontrollable output issues. We also notice that no clear scaling laws exist for current GraphLLM methods. In addition, both structures and semantics are crucial for effective zero-shot transfer, and our proposed simple baseline can even outperform several models tailored for zero-shot scenarios. The data and code of the benchmark can be found at https://github.com/NineAbyss/GLBench.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLM Features Can Hurt GNNs: Concatenation Interference on Homophilous Graph Benchmarks

    cs.LG 2026-06 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pure concatenation of LLM features degrades GNN accuracy on homophilous datasets, with Delta_sig metric predicting when the drop occurs better than homophily.

  2. Evaluating LLMs on Large-Scale Graph Property Estimation via Random Walks

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    EstGraph benchmark evaluates LLMs on estimating properties of very large graphs from random-walk samples that fit in context limits.

  3. GABench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents on Graph Analysis Tasks

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GABench provides the first agentic graph-analysis benchmark with 10,400 executable tasks, and finds existing LLM agents succeed on under 40% of complex graph tasks.

Pith tools