REVIEW 3 cited by
GLBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized the way we interact with graphs, leading to a new paradigm called GraphLLM. Despite the rapid development of GraphLLM methods in recent years, the progress and understanding of this field remain unclear due to the lack of a benchmark with consistent experimental protocols. To bridge this gap, we introduce GLBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating GraphLLM methods in both supervised and zero-shot scenarios. GLBench provides a fair and thorough evaluation of different categories of GraphLLM methods, along with traditional baselines such as graph neural networks. Through extensive experiments on a collection of real-world datasets with consistent data processing and splitting strategies, we have uncovered several key findings. Firstly, GraphLLM methods outperform traditional baselines in supervised settings, with LLM-as-enhancers showing the most robust performance. However, using LLMs as predictors is less effective and often leads to uncontrollable output issues. We also notice that no clear scaling laws exist for current GraphLLM methods. In addition, both structures and semantics are crucial for effective zero-shot transfer, and our proposed simple baseline can even outperform several models tailored for zero-shot scenarios. The data and code of the benchmark can be found at https://github.com/NineAbyss/GLBench.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
LLM Features Can Hurt GNNs: Concatenation Interference on Homophilous Graph Benchmarks
Pure concatenation of LLM features degrades GNN accuracy on homophilous datasets, with Delta_sig metric predicting when the drop occurs better than homophily.
-
Evaluating LLMs on Large-Scale Graph Property Estimation via Random Walks
EstGraph benchmark evaluates LLMs on estimating properties of very large graphs from random-walk samples that fit in context limits.
-
GABench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents on Graph Analysis Tasks
GABench provides the first agentic graph-analysis benchmark with 10,400 executable tasks, and finds existing LLM agents succeed on under 40% of complex graph tasks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.