Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Benchmarking Embedding Aggregation Methods in Computational Pathology: A Clinical Data Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.07841 v2 pith:HWFUOS7B submitted 2024-07-10 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords aggregationmodelspathologytechniquesacrossanalysisbenchmarkingclinical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), in particular self-supervised learning of foundation models (FMs), are revolutionizing medical imaging and computational pathology (CPath). A constant challenge in the analysis of digital Whole Slide Images (WSIs) is the problem of aggregating tens of thousands of tile-level image embeddings to a slide-level representation. Due to the prevalent use of datasets created for genomic research, such as TCGA, for method development, the performance of these techniques on diagnostic slides from clinical practice has been inadequately explored. This study conducts a thorough benchmarking analysis of ten slide-level aggregation techniques across nine clinically relevant tasks, including diagnostic assessment, biomarker classification, and outcome prediction. The results yield following key insights: (1) Embeddings derived from domain-specific (histological images) FMs outperform those from generic ImageNet-based models across aggregation methods. (2) Spatial-aware aggregators enhance the performance significantly when using ImageNet pre-trained models but not when using FMs. (3) No single model excels in all tasks and spatially-aware models do not show general superiority as it would be expected. These findings underscore the need for more adaptable and universally applicable aggregation techniques, guiding future research towards tools that better meet the evolving needs of clinical-AI in pathology. The code used in this work is available at \url{https://github.com/fuchs-lab-public/CPath_SABenchmark}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do Multiple Instance Learning Models Transfer?

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pretrained multiple instance learning models transfer across organs and tasks in computational pathology, and pancancer pretraining can rival slide foundation models with far less data.

  2. Predict Patient Self-reported Race from Skin Histological Images

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Deep learning models predict self-reported race from skin histology slides with moderate accuracy, using epidermal tissue as the primary morphological shortcut.

Pith tools