Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Do Multiple Instance Learning Models Transfer?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.09022 v2 pith:E3MOPJUJ submitted 2025-06-10 cs.CV

Do Multiple Instance Learning Models Transfer?

classification cs.CV
keywords modelslearningtransfercpathpretrainedpretrainingtasksacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) is a cornerstone approach in computational pathology (CPath) for generating clinically meaningful slide-level embeddings from gigapixel tissue images. However, MIL often struggles with small, weakly supervised clinical datasets. In contrast to fields such as NLP and conventional computer vision, where transfer learning is widely used to address data scarcity, the transferability of MIL models remains poorly understood. In this study, we systematically evaluate the transfer learning capabilities of pretrained MIL models by assessing 11 models across 21 pretraining tasks for morphological and molecular subtype prediction. Our results show that pretrained MIL models, even when trained on different organs than the target task, consistently outperform models trained from scratch. Moreover, pretraining on pancancer datasets enables strong generalization across organs and tasks, outperforming slide foundation models while using substantially less pretraining data. These findings highlight the robust adaptability of MIL models and demonstrate the benefits of leveraging transfer learning to boost performance in CPath. Lastly, we provide a resource which standardizes the implementation of MIL models and collection of pretrained model weights on popular CPath tasks, available at https://github.com/mahmoodlab/MIL-Lab

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PC-MIL: Decoupling Feature Resolution from Supervision Scale in Whole-Slide Learning

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PC-MIL shows that anchoring supervision at a 2 mm scale and progressively mixing slide- and region-level labels improves cross-context accuracy in WSI cancer detection without reducing global performance.

  2. From Patches to Patients: A study of the tile-to-slide performance transferability in Digital Pathology

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High correlation between tile-level linear probing and slide-level performance of foundation models across 58 tasks indicates tile benchmarks can reliably shortlist strong candidates for WSI analysis.