REVIEW 4 cited by
CXR-Agent: Vision-language models for chest X-ray interpretation with uncertainty aware radiology reporting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
CXR-Agent: Vision-language models for chest X-ray interpretation with uncertainty aware radiology reporting
read the original abstract
Recently large vision-language models have shown potential when interpreting complex images and generating natural language descriptions using advanced reasoning. Medicine's inherently multimodal nature incorporating scans and text-based medical histories to write reports makes it conducive to benefit from these leaps in AI capabilities. We evaluate the publicly available, state of the art, foundational vision-language models for chest X-ray interpretation across several datasets and benchmarks. We use linear probes to evaluate the performance of various components including CheXagent's vision transformer and Q-former, which outperform the industry-standard Torch X-ray Vision models across many different datasets showing robust generalisation capabilities. Importantly, we find that vision-language models often hallucinate with confident language, which slows down clinical interpretation. Based on these findings, we develop an agent-based vision-language approach for report generation using CheXagent's linear probes and BioViL-T's phrase grounding tools to generate uncertainty-aware radiology reports with pathologies localised and described based on their likelihood. We thoroughly evaluate our vision-language agents using NLP metrics, chest X-ray benchmarks and clinical evaluations by developing an evaluation platform to perform a user study with respiratory specialists. Our results show considerable improvements in accuracy, interpretability and safety of the AI-generated reports. We stress the importance of analysing results for normal and abnormal scans separately. Finally, we emphasise the need for larger paired (scan and report) datasets alongside data augmentation to tackle overfitting seen in these large vision-language models.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
MedOpenClaw and MedFlowBench: Auditing Medical Agents in Full-Study Workflows
MedFlowBench evaluates VLM agents on full radiology and pathology studies by requiring both task answers and verifiable evidence like key slices and regions of interest, revealing that answer-only scores overestimate ...
-
GAZE: Grounded Agentic Zero-shot Evaluation with Viewer-Level Tools and Literature Retrieval on Rare Brain MRI
GAZE framework with viewer tools and literature retrieval achieves 58.2 mAP@0.3 lesion localization and 34.9% top-1 diagnostic accuracy on 906 rare brain MRI cases in zero-shot setting, with larger gains on rarest pat...
-
DUCX: Decomposing Unfairness in Tool-Using Chest X-ray Agents
Tool-using chest X-ray agents show demographic disparities in tool usage, routing, and reasoning that are not visible from end-to-end accuracy alone.
-
Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges
A survey that deconstructs LLM agent systems via a methodology-centered taxonomy linking design principles to emergent behaviors, applications, and challenges.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.