Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Probing-Enhanced Stochastic Programming

Optimization and Control · Submitted 15 Jul 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that on instances with finite support, our approach scales significantly better than the MIP formulation and also demonstrate that our method can compute statistical bounds on instances with continuous distributions that improve upon the perfect information bounds.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2407.10669 (version 1)
Pith ID443ASPJV, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJames R. Luedtke, Jeff Linderoth, Logan R. Matthews, Youngdae Kim, Zhichao Ma. "Probing-Enhanced Stochastic Programming." arXiv:2407.10669 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/443ASPJV
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,531 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.45 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.21 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider a two-stage stochastic decision problem where the decision-maker has the opportunity to obtain information about the distribution of the random variables $\xi$ that appear in the problem through a set of discrete actions that we refer to as \emph{probing}. Probing components of a random vector $\eta$ that is jointly-distributed with $\xi$ allows the decision-maker to learn about the conditional distribution of $\xi$ given the observed components of $\eta$. We propose a three-stage optimization model for this problem, where in the first stage some components of $\eta$ are chosen to be observed, and decisions in subsequent stages must be consistent with the obtained information. In the case that $\eta$ and $\xi$ have finite support, Goel and Grossmann gave a mixed-integer programming (MIP) formulation of this problem whose size is proportional to the square of cardinality of the sample space of the random variables. We propose to solve the model using bounds obtained from an information-based relaxation, combined with a branching scheme that enforces the consistency of decisions with observed information. The branch-and-bound approach can naturally be combined with sampling in order to estimate both lower and upper bounds on the optimal solution value and does not require $\eta$ or $\xi$ to have finite support. We conduct a computational study of our method on instances of a stochastic facility location and sizing problem with the option to probe customers to learn about their demands before building facilities. We find that on instances with finite support, our approach scales significantly better than the MIP formulation and also demonstrate that our method can compute statistical bounds on instances with continuous distributions that improve upon the perfect information bounds.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider a two-stage stochastic decision problem where the decision-maker has the opportunity to obtain information about the distribution of the random variables $\xi$ that appear in the problem through a set of discrete actions that we refer to as \emph{probing}. background 0.96 0.22 0.03 asserted 0.95
s1 Probing components of a random vector $\eta$ that is jointly-distributed with $\xi$ allows the decision-maker to learn about the conditional distribution of $\xi$ given the observed components of $\eta$. background 0.95 0.11 0.03 asserted 0.80
s2 We propose a three-stage optimization model for this problem, where in the first stage some components of $\eta$ are chosen to be observed, and decisions in subsequent stages must be consistent with the obtained information. method 0.67 0.74 0.04 asserted 0.99
s3 In the case that $\eta$ and $\xi$ have finite support, Goel and Grossmann gave a mixed-integer programming (MIP) formulation of this problem whose size is proportional to the square of cardinality of the sample space of the random variables. background 0.99 0.03 0.03 asserted 1.00
s4 We propose to solve the model using bounds obtained from an information-based relaxation, combined with a branching scheme that enforces the consistency of decisions with observed information. method 0.96 0.86 0.09 asserted 0.86
s5 The branch-and-bound approach can naturally be combined with sampling in order to estimate both lower and upper bounds on the optimal solution value and does not require $\eta$ or $\xi$ to have finite support. method 0.83 0.59 0.11 asserted 0.78
s6 We conduct a computational study of our method on instances of a stochastic facility location and sizing problem with the option to probe customers to learn about their demands before building facilities. contribution 0.65 0.96 0.05 asserted 0.91
s7 We find that on instances with finite support, our approach scales significantly better than the MIP formulation and also demonstrate that our method can compute statistical bounds on instances with continuous distributions that improve upon the perfect information bounds. result 1.00 0.97 0.78 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider a two-stage stochastic decision problem where the decision-maker has the opportunity to obtain information about the distribution of the random variables $\xi$ that appear in the problem through a set of discrete actions that we refer to as \emph{probing}. Probing components of a random vector $\eta$ that is jointly-distributed with $\xi$ allows the decision-maker to learn about the conditional distribution of $\xi$ given the observed components of $\eta$. We propose a three-stage optimization model for this problem, where in the first stage some components of $\eta$ are chosen to be observed, and decisions in subsequent stages must be consistent with the obtained information. In the case that $\eta$ and $\xi$ have finite support, Goel and Grossmann gave a mixed-integer programming (MIP) formulation of this problem whose size is proportional to the square of cardinality of the sample space of the random variables. We propose to solve the model using bounds obtained from an information-based relaxation, combined with a branching scheme that enforces the consistency of decisions with observed information. The branch-and-bound approach can naturally be combined with sampling in order to estimate both lower and upper bounds on the optimal solution value and does not require $\eta$ or $\xi$ to have finite support. We conduct a computational study of our method on instances of a stochastic facility location and sizing problem with the option to probe customers to learn about their demands before building facilities. We find that on instances with finite support, our approach scales significantly better than the MIP formulation and also demonstrate that our method can compute statistical bounds on instances with continuous distributions that improve upon the perfect information bounds.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.