Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automated essay scoring in Arabic: a dataset and analysis of a BERT-based system

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.11212 v1 pith:LOYPTDK4 submitted 2024-07-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords essaypercentarabicessaysfirsthumanscoringautomated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated Essay Scoring (AES) holds significant promise in the field of education, helping educators to mark larger volumes of essays and provide timely feedback. However, Arabic AES research has been limited by the lack of publicly available essay data. This study introduces AR-AES, an Arabic AES benchmark dataset comprising 2046 undergraduate essays, including gender information, scores, and transparent rubric-based evaluation guidelines, providing comprehensive insights into the scoring process. These essays come from four diverse courses, covering both traditional and online exams. Additionally, we pioneer the use of AraBERT for AES, exploring its performance on different question types. We find encouraging results, particularly for Environmental Chemistry and source-dependent essay questions. For the first time, we examine the scale of errors made by a BERT-based AES system, observing that 96.15 percent of the errors are within one point of the first human marker's prediction, on a scale of one to five, with 79.49 percent of predictions matching exactly. In contrast, additional human markers did not exceed 30 percent exact matches with the first marker, with 62.9 percent within one mark. These findings highlight the subjectivity inherent in essay grading, and underscore the potential for current AES technology to assist human markers to grade consistently across large classes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How well can LLMs Grade Essays in Arabic?

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Generative LLMs, including Arabic-specific ones, underperform a fine-tuned BERT model on Arabic essay scoring, with bilingual prompting giving the best LLM results.

Pith tools