Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

When can transformers compositionally generalize in-context?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.12275 v1 pith:FWU7GQ54 submitted 2024-07-17 cs.LG cs.NE

classification cs.LGcs.NE
keywords taskscompositionallygeneralizepossibletasktransformerscomponentscompositional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many tasks can be composed from a few independent components. This gives rise to a combinatorial explosion of possible tasks, only some of which might be encountered during training. Under what circumstances can transformers compositionally generalize from a subset of tasks to all possible combinations of tasks that share similar components? Here we study a modular multitask setting that allows us to precisely control compositional structure in the data generation process. We present evidence that transformers learning in-context struggle to generalize compositionally on this task despite being in principle expressive enough to do so. Compositional generalization becomes possible only when introducing a bottleneck that enforces an explicit separation between task inference and task execution.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Energy-Based Transformers are Scalable Learners and Thinkers

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Energy-Based Transformers learn to predict by gradient-descent minimization of a learned energy function, and the paper reports faster pretraining scaling and inference-time thinking gains over Transformer++ and Diffu...

  2. Behavioural vs. Representational Systematicity in End-to-End Models: An Opinionated Survey

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey showing that common systematic generalization benchmarks measure behavioural systematicity, not the representational systematicity that Fodor and Pylyshyn's challenge requires, and mapping them onto Hadley's ...

Pith tools