REVIEW 1 cited by
Voices in a Crowd: Searching for Clusters of Unique Perspectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Language models have been shown to reproduce underlying biases existing in their training data, which is the majority perspective by default. Proposed solutions aim to capture minority perspectives by either modelling annotator disagreements or grouping annotators based on shared metadata, both of which face significant challenges. We propose a framework that trains models without encoding annotator metadata, extracts latent embeddings informed by annotator behaviour, and creates clusters of similar opinions, that we refer to as voices. Resulting clusters are validated post-hoc via internal and external quantitative metrics, as well a qualitative analysis to identify the type of voice that each cluster represents. Our results demonstrate the strong generalisation capability of our framework, indicated by resulting clusters being adequately robust, while also capturing minority perspectives based on different demographic factors throughout two distinct datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Explaining Matters: Leveraging Definitions and Semantic Expansion for Sexism Detection
On the EDOS benchmark, definition-based augmentation and context expansion with a Mistral-7B tie-breaker reach macro F1 0.8819 (binary) and 0.6018 (fine-grained).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.