REVIEW 4 cited by
AMONGAGENTS: Evaluating Large Language Models in the Interactive Text-Based Social Deduction Game
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
AMONGAGENTS: Evaluating Large Language Models in the Interactive Text-Based Social Deduction Game
read the original abstract
Strategic social deduction games serve as valuable testbeds for evaluating the understanding and inference skills of language models, offering crucial insights into social science, artificial intelligence, and strategic gaming. This paper focuses on creating proxies of human behavior in simulated environments, with Among Us utilized as a tool for studying simulated human behavior. The study introduces a text-based game environment, named AmongAgents, that mirrors the dynamics of Among Us. Players act as crew members aboard a spaceship, tasked with identifying impostors who are sabotaging the ship and eliminating the crew. Within this environment, the behavior of simulated language agents is analyzed. The experiments involve diverse game sequences featuring different configurations of Crewmates and Impostor personality archetypes. Our work demonstrates that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) can effectively grasp the game rules and make decisions based on the current context. This work aims to promote further exploration of LLMs in goal-oriented games with incomplete information and complex action spaces, as these settings offer valuable opportunities to assess language model performance in socially driven scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
MafiaScope: Non-Invasive, Time-Resolved Belief Probing for LLM Agents in Social Deduction Games
Non-invasive per-utterance belief probes in Mafia, auto-scored against engine truth, expose poorly calibrated LLM confidence and 1.5× over-prediction of being suspected.
-
Even More Deception: Objective Misalignment in Mixed-Motive LLM Multi-Agent Systems
Changing one LLM agent's secret objective in Werewolf lowers its team's win rate and changes its reasoning, while its public chat stays deceptively normal.
-
MafiaScope: Non-Invasive, Time-Resolved Belief Probing for LLM Agents in Social Deduction Games
A released open-source testbed that privately probes LLM agents' beliefs during Mafia games shows agents are overconfident, over-predict suspicion by 1.5x, and rarely change outcomes when wrong beliefs lock in a vote.
-
SocialGrid: A Benchmark for Planning and Social Reasoning in Embodied Multi-Agent Systems
SocialGrid benchmark shows even top LLMs achieve below 60% in embodied planning and task completion, with deception detection near random chance regardless of model scale.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.