Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

u-μP: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.17465 v3 pith:MJ6PJPKR submitted 2024-07-24 cs.LG

u-μP: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrization

classification cs.LG
keywords modelmodelsactivationsensuresindependentmaximalparametrizationscale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Maximal Update Parametrization ($\mu$P) aims to make the optimal hyperparameters (HPs) of a model independent of its size, allowing them to be swept using a cheap proxy model rather than the full-size target model. We present a new scheme, u-$\mu$P, which improves upon $\mu$P by combining it with Unit Scaling, a method for designing models that makes them easy to train in low-precision. The two techniques have a natural affinity: $\mu$P ensures that the scale of activations is independent of model size, and Unit Scaling ensures that activations, weights and gradients begin training with a scale of one. This synthesis opens the door to a simpler scheme, whose default values are near-optimal. This in turn facilitates a more efficient sweeping strategy, with u-$\mu$P models reaching a loss that is equal to or lower than comparable $\mu$P models and working out-of-the-box in FP8.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Why Low-Precision Transformer Training Fails: An Analysis on Flash Attention

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Low-precision Flash Attention fails due to similar low-rank attention representations combined with biased rounding errors that accumulate and corrupt weight updates; a minimal fix to reduce rounding bias stabilizes training.

  2. Hyperball May Not Be a Free Lunch

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Hyperball optimizers like MuonH owe their phase-dependent behavior mostly to an implicit effective-learning-rate schedule, not to radial-update suppression or intrinsically better update directions.