Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Survey on biomarkers in human vocalizations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.17505 v2 pith:FKUSTBCG submitted 2024-07-07 q-bio.NC cs.CL

classification q-bio.NCcs.CL
keywords biomarkersnoisesourcessurveytechnologiesvocaladoptionanother
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent years has witnessed an increase in technologies that use speech for the sensing of the health of the talker. This survey paper proposes a general taxonomy of the technologies and a broad overview of current progress and challenges. Vocal biomarkers are often secondary measures that are approximating a signal of another sensor or identifying an underlying mental, cognitive, or physiological state. Their measurement involve disturbances and uncertainties that may be considered as noise sources and the biomarkers are coarsely qualified in terms of the various sources of noise involved in their determination. While in some proposed biomarkers the error levels seem high, there are vocal biomarkers where the errors are expected to be low and thus are more likely to qualify as candidates for adoption in healthcare applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HPP-Voice: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Speech Embeddings for Multi-Phenotypic Classification

    eess.AS 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 30-second counting task, embedded with speaker-identification models, predicts male sleep apnea (AUC 0.64) and shows gender- and condition-specific model rankings across a new 7,188-recording clinical speech benchmark.

Pith tools