Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LLAVADI: What Matters For Multimodal Large Language Models Distillation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.19409 v1 pith:6H72XOY4 submitted 2024-07-28 cs.CL cs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords distillationmodelsmllmsmodellanguagelargemultimodalsmall-scale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The recent surge in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has showcased their remarkable potential for achieving generalized intelligence by integrating visual understanding into Large Language Models.Nevertheless, the sheer model size of MLLMs leads to substantial memory and computational demands that hinder their widespread deployment. In this work, we do not propose a new efficient model structure or train small-scale MLLMs from scratch. Instead, we focus on what matters for training small-scale MLLMs through knowledge distillation, which is the first step from the multimodal distillation perspective. Our extensive studies involve training strategies, model choices, and distillation algorithms in the knowledge distillation process. These results show that joint alignment for both tokens and logit alignment plays critical roles in teacher-student frameworks. In addition, we draw a series of intriguing observations from this study. By evaluating different benchmarks and proper strategy, even a 2.7B small-scale model can perform on par with larger models with 7B or 13B parameters. Our code and models will be publicly available for further research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Token-level Response-visual Attention Guidance for Multimodal LLMs Knowledge Distillation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Response-to-vision attention similarity predicts MLLM student performance far better than prompt-to-vision, and entropy-adaptive token-wise KL distillation (TRAG) transfers that signal effectively.

  2. SelfAug: Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Distribution Self-Alignment

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding a KL penalty between fine-tuned and original model logits on input tokens during RAG fine-tuning reduces catastrophic forgetting while preserving downstream performance.

  3. GreedyPrune: Retenting Critical Visual Token Set for Large Vision Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training-free token pruning method that combines cosine-similarity saliency with greedy redundancy removal to preserve accuracy at high compression ratios.

Pith tools