pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.21278 · v2 · submitted 2024-07-31 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-lat· hep-th

Universal Euler-Cartan Circuits for Quantum Field Theories

Ananda Roy , Robert M. Konik , David Rogerson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 22:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-lathep-th
keywords hybrid quantum-classical algorithmsparametrized quantum circuitsEuler-Cartan decompositionslattice quantum field theoriesnon-perturbative computationsfalse vacuamesonic excitationsbaryonic excitations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hybrid quantum-classical algorithm uses a universal circuit ansatz from Euler and Cartan decompositions to compute non-perturbative properties of lattice quantum field theories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm that embeds quantum hardware in classical frameworks to calculate non-perturbative features of quantum field theories. The method relies on a parametrized circuit ansatz constructed from Euler and Cartan decompositions of single- and two-qubit operators. It is demonstrated by calculating energy spectra on lattice models that include both short-range and long-range interactions. Low-depth circuits are given explicitly for false vacua and for mesonic and baryonic excited states. The approach is positioned to enable calculations of mass ratios, scattering amplitudes, and false-vacuum decay rates that remain difficult for purely classical methods.

Core claim

The authors construct a universal parametrized quantum circuit ansatz from Euler and Cartan decompositions that serves as the variational form for a hybrid algorithm; this ansatz reproduces the energy spectra of lattice quantum field theories with short- and long-range interactions, supplies explicit low-depth circuits for false vacua, and generates circuits for mesonic and baryonic excitations in the same models.

What carries the argument

The universal parametrized quantum circuit ansatz obtained from Euler and Cartan decompositions of single- and two-qubit operators, which parametrizes the relevant quantum states at low circuit depth.

If this is right

  • Low-depth circuits are obtained for false vacua in the studied lattice models.
  • Low-depth circuits are obtained for highly excited mesonic and baryonic states.
  • The same ansatz supplies a route to mass ratios, scattering amplitudes, and false-vacuum decays in quantum field theories.
  • The hybrid method applies to both short-range and long-range interacting lattice realizations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The ansatz could be reused for other variational tasks such as computing correlation functions or matrix elements beyond the energy spectrum.
  • If the circuit depth remains modest on larger lattices, the method would open a practical path to real-time dynamics in strongly coupled field theories.
  • The decomposition technique itself may transfer to circuit constructions for condensed-matter or quantum-chemistry Hamiltonians that share similar local operator structure.

Load-bearing premise

Low-depth circuits built on small lattices will continue to suffice for extracting mass ratios, scattering amplitudes, and false-vacuum decays once the same ansatz is applied to larger lattices.

What would settle it

Direct numerical comparison, on a lattice large enough for reliable extraction of mass ratios, between the hybrid algorithm's output and independent classical results or known analytic values for the same model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2407.21278 by Ananda Roy, David Rogerson, Robert M. Konik.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the proposed algorithm initialized with a state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) - (c) Results obtained for the ground state energies ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) - (b) Results for the first seven excited states obtained using optimized Euler-Cartan circuits for the Ising [(a)] and Potts [(b)] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum computers can efficiently solve problems which are widely believed to lie beyond the reach of classical computers. In the near-term, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, which efficiently embed quantum hardware in classical frameworks, are crucial in bridging the vast divide in the performance of the purely-quantum algorithms and their classical counterparts. Here, a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm is presented for the computation of non-perturbative characteristics of quantum field theories. The presented algorithm relies on a universal parametrized quantum circuit ansatz based on Euler and Cartan's decompositions of single and two-qubit operators. It is benchmarked by computing the energy spectra of lattice realizations of quantum field theories with both short and long range interactions. Low depth circuits are provided for false vacua as well as highly excited states corresponding to mesonic and baryonic excitations occurring in the analyzed models. The described algorithm opens a hitherto-unexplored avenue for the investigation of mass-ratios, scattering amplitudes and false-vacuum decays in quantum field theories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm for non-perturbative characteristics of quantum field theories, relying on a universal parametrized quantum circuit ansatz constructed from Euler and Cartan decompositions of single- and two-qubit operators. It reports benchmarking via computation of energy spectra on small lattices for models with short- and long-range interactions, supplying low-depth circuits for false vacua and mesonic/baryonic excitations, and claims this opens avenues for mass ratios, scattering amplitudes, and false-vacuum decays.

Significance. If the ansatz proves universal and the low-depth property scales while maintaining expressivity, the approach could enable new hybrid simulations of QFT observables on near-term hardware that are challenging for classical methods. The explicit construction of circuits for specific states on small lattices is a concrete contribution, though broader impact hinges on unshown extensions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the algorithm 'opens a hitherto-unexplored avenue for the investigation of mass-ratios, scattering amplitudes and false-vacuum decays' rests on the untested extrapolation that the Euler-Cartan ansatz will retain low depth and sufficient expressivity for these observables on larger lattices; only energy spectra on small lattices are benchmarked, with no depth-vs-N scaling, error estimates, or results for scattering/false-vacuum quantities provided.
  2. [Benchmarking section] Benchmarking description: the assertion of 'low depth circuits' for highly excited states is not accompanied by quantitative depth comparisons, baseline classical or other variational methods, or analysis of how circuit depth grows with lattice size or interaction range, which is load-bearing for the hybrid algorithm's claimed advantage.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'lattice realizations of quantum field theories with both short and long range interactions' without naming the specific models (e.g., Ising, Schwinger) or citing standard references for the Hamiltonians used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the algorithm 'opens a hitherto-unexplored avenue for the investigation of mass-ratios, scattering amplitudes and false-vacuum decays' rests on the untested extrapolation that the Euler-Cartan ansatz will retain low depth and sufficient expressivity for these observables on larger lattices; only energy spectra on small lattices are benchmarked, with no depth-vs-N scaling, error estimates, or results for scattering/false-vacuum quantities provided.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract statement extrapolates from the universality of the Euler-Cartan ansatz and its demonstrated performance on energy spectra for small lattices. The manuscript does not provide scaling analysis, error estimates, or computations for mass ratios, scattering amplitudes, or false-vacuum decays. We will revise the abstract to more precisely describe the benchmarked results and frame the broader applications as potential future directions rather than a direct claim of the current work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Benchmarking section] Benchmarking description: the assertion of 'low depth circuits' for highly excited states is not accompanied by quantitative depth comparisons, baseline classical or other variational methods, or analysis of how circuit depth grows with lattice size or interaction range, which is load-bearing for the hybrid algorithm's claimed advantage.

    Authors: The manuscript supplies explicit circuit constructions for the false vacua and mesonic/baryonic excitations on the small lattices considered, obtained via the Euler-Cartan decomposition. Quantitative depth comparisons to other variational methods and scaling with lattice size or interaction range are not included. We will add a discussion of the achieved depths for the presented cases and note the lack of scaling analysis as an important open question, while clarifying that the low-depth property is shown explicitly only for the benchmarked small systems. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: ansatz uses standard decompositions; benchmarks are direct computations

full rationale

The paper introduces a parametrized circuit ansatz constructed from the well-known Euler decomposition of single-qubit unitaries and Cartan decomposition of two-qubit unitaries, both standard results in quantum information that predate the authors. It then directly computes energy spectra on small lattices for false vacua and excitations; these are explicit numerical evaluations of the circuit expectation values, not predictions obtained by fitting parameters to a subset and then re-using the same fit. No derivation step equates an output quantity to an input by construction, no self-citation is invoked to justify uniqueness or forbid alternatives, and the forward claim about scalability to mass ratios or scattering is presented as an untested extrapolation rather than a tautology. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external mathematical facts and direct computation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; the only identifiable assumption is the standard domain claim that Euler-Cartan decompositions yield a universal parametrization for the relevant qubit operators. No free parameters or invented entities are quantified.

free parameters (1)
  • circuit parameters
    The ansatz is parametrized and optimized classically, but neither the number nor the fitting procedure is specified.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Euler and Cartan decompositions furnish a universal parametrization of single- and two-qubit unitaries suitable for QFT state preparation.
    Invoked when the abstract states that the algorithm 'relies on a universal parametrized quantum circuit ansatz based on Euler and Cartan's decompositions'.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5699 in / 1284 out tokens · 32709 ms · 2026-05-23T22:45:23.969681+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R. P. Feynman, Simulating Physics with Quantum Computers, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21, 467 (1982)

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    S. P. Jordan, K. S. M. Lee, and J. Preskill, Quantum Compu- tation of Scattering in Scalar Quantum Field Theories, Quant. Inf. Comput. 14 (2014), arXiv:1112.4833 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    S. P. Jordan, K. S. M. Lee, and J. Preskill, Quantum Algo- rithms for Quantum Field Theories, Science 336, 1130 (2012), arXiv:1111.3633 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    S. P. Jordan, K. S. M. Lee, and J. Preskill, Quantum Al- gorithms for Fermionic Quantum Field Theories, (2014), arXiv:1404.7115 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Peruzzo, A

    A. Peruzzo, A. Laing, A. Politi, T. Rudolph, and J. L. O'Brien, Multimode quantum interference of photons in multiport integrated devices, Nature Communications 2, 10.1038/ncomms1228 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms1228 2011

  6. [6]

    Tilly, H

    J. Tilly, H. Chen, S. Cao, D. Picozzi, K. Setia, Y . Li, E. Grant, L. Wossnig, I. Rungger, G. H. Booth, et al. , The variational quantum eigensolver: a review of methods and best practices, Physics Reports 986, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    H. R. Grimsley, S. E. Economou, E. Barnes, and N. J. Mayhall, An adaptive variational algorithm for exact molecular simula- tions on a quantum computer, Nature Communications10, 3007 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    H. L. Tang, V . Shkolnikov, G. S. Barron, H. R. Grimsley, N. J. Mayhall, E. Barnes, and S. E. Economou, Qubit-adapt-vqe: An adaptive algorithm for constructing hardware-efficient ans ¨atze on a quantum processor, PRX Quantum 2, 020310 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

    E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, A quantum approxi- mate optimization algorithm (2014), arXiv:1411.4028 [quant- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Quantum approximate optimization is computationally universal

    S. Lloyd, Quantum approximate optimization is computation- ally universal (2018), arXiv:1812.11075 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Kandala, A

    A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, K. Temme, M. Takita, M. Brink, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum mag- nets, Nature 549, 242 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    M. P. Harrigan, K. J. Sung, M. Neeley, K. J. Satzinger, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, S. Boixo, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, N. Bush- nell, Y . Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, S. Demura, A. Dunsworth, D. Eppens, A. Fowler, B. Foxen, C. Gidney, M. Giustina, R. Graff, S. Habegger, A. Ho,...

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Fletcher, Practical Methods of Optimization (Wiley, 2013)

    R. Fletcher, Practical Methods of Optimization (Wiley, 2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic opti- mization (2017), arXiv:1412.6980 [cs.LG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Stokes, J

    J. Stokes, J. Izaac, N. Killoran, and G. Carleo, Quantum natural gradient, Quantum 4, 269 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Hadfield, Z

    S. Hadfield, Z. Wang, B. O'Gorman, E. Rieffel, D. Venturelli, and R. Biswas, From the quantum approximate optimization algorithm to a quantum alternating operator ansatz, Algorithms 12, 34 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Z. Wang, N. C. Rubin, J. M. Dominy, and E. G. Rieffel, xy mixers: Analytical and numerical results for the quantum alter- nating operator ansatz, Phys. Rev. A 101, 012320 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    M. C. Ba ˜nuls, K. Cichy, K. Jansen, and J. I. Cirac, The mass spectrum of the Schwinger model with Matrix Product States, JHEP 11, 158, arXiv:1305.3765 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Savage, Scal- able circuits for preparing ground states on digital quantum computers: The schwinger model vacuum on 100 qubits, PRX Quantum 5, 020315 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Ikhlef, J

    Y . Ikhlef, J. L. Jacobsen, and H. Saleur, Integrable spin chain for the SL(2, r)/U(1) black hole sigma model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 081601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    V . V . Bazhanov, G. A. Kotousov, S. M. Koval, and S. L. Lukyanov, Scaling limit of the Z2 invariant inhomoge- neous six-vertex model, Nucl. Phys. B 965, 115337 (2021), arXiv:2010.10613 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    L ¨uscher and U

    M. L ¨uscher and U. Wolff, How to calculate the elastic scattering matrix in two-dimensional quantum field theories by numerical simulation, Nuclear Physics B 339, 222 (1990)

    work page 1990

  23. [23]

    L ¨uscher, Two-particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix, Nuclear Physics B 354, 531 (1991)

    M. L ¨uscher, Two-particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix, Nuclear Physics B 354, 531 (1991)

    work page 1991

  24. [24]

    Hardy et al

    A. Hardy et al. , Optimized Quantum Simulation Algorithms for Scalar Quantum Field Theories, (2024), arXiv:2407.13819 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    work page 2000

  26. [26]

    Helgason, Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces (1978)

    S. Helgason, Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces (1978)

    work page 1978

  27. [27]

    R. R. Tucci, An introduction to cartan’s kak decomposition for qc programmers (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0507171 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  28. [28]

    Vatan and C

    F. Vatan and C. Williams, Optimal quantum circuits for general two-qubit gates, Phys. Rev. A 69, 032315 (2004)

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    Vidal and C

    G. Vidal and C. M. Dawson, Universal quantum circuit for two- qubit transformations with three controlled-not gates, Phys. Rev. A 69, 010301 (2004)

    work page 2004

  30. [30]

    Wierichs, C

    D. Wierichs, C. Gogolin, and M. Kastoryano, Avoiding local minima in variational quantum eigensolvers with the natural gradient optimizer, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043246 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    A. Roy, S. Erramilli, and R. M. Konik, Efficient Quantum Cir- cuits based on the Quantum Natural Gradient, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2310.10538 (2023), arXiv:2310.10538 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Zanardi, P

    P. Zanardi, P. Giorda, and M. Cozzini, Information-theoretic differential geometry of quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 100603 (2007)

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    Amari, Natural Gradient Works Effi- ciently in Learning, Neural Computation 10, 7 251 (1998), https://direct.mit.edu/neco/article- pdf/10/2/251/813415/089976698300017746.pdf

    S.-i. Amari, Natural Gradient Works Effi- ciently in Learning, Neural Computation 10, 7 251 (1998), https://direct.mit.edu/neco/article- pdf/10/2/251/813415/089976698300017746.pdf

    work page 1998

  34. [34]

    Wierichs, J

    D. Wierichs, J. Izaac, C. Wang, and C. Y .-Y . Lin, General parameter-shift rules for quantum gradients, Quantum 6, 677 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Lamb and et al, In preparation, (2024)

    C. Lamb and et al, In preparation, (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Zamolodchikov, Integrable field theory from conformal field theory, in Integrable Sys Quantum Field Theory , edited by M

    A. Zamolodchikov, Integrable field theory from conformal field theory, in Integrable Sys Quantum Field Theory , edited by M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, and A. Tsuchiya (Academic Press, San Diego, 1989) pp. 641 – 674

    work page 1989

  37. [37]

    B. M. McCoy and T. T. Wu, Two-dimensional ising field theory in a magnetic field: Breakup of the cut in the two-point func- tion, Phys. Rev. D 18, 1259 (1978)

    work page 1978

  38. [38]

    Ising Spectroscopy I: Mesons at T < T_c

    P. Fonseca and A. Zamolodchikov, Ising spectroscopy. I. Mesons at T < T c, (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0612304

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  39. [39]

    ’t Hooft, A two-dimensional model for mesons, Nuclear Physics B 75, 461 (1974)

    G. ’t Hooft, A two-dimensional model for mesons, Nuclear Physics B 75, 461 (1974)

    work page 1974

  40. [40]

    S. B. Rutkevich, Two-kink bound states in the magnetically perturbed Potts field theory at T < T(c), J. Phys. 43, 235004 (2010), arXiv:0907.3697 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  41. [41]

    S. B. Rutkevich, Baryon masses in the three-state Potts field theory in a weak magnetic field, J. Stat. Mech. 1501, P01010 (2015), arXiv:1408.1818 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Confinement in the q-state Potts model: an RG-TCSA study

    M. Lencses and G. Takacs, Confinement in the q-state Potts model: an RG-TCSA study, JHEP 09, 146, arXiv:1506.06477 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    S. B. Rutkevich, Radiative corrections to the quark masses in the ferromagnetic Ising and Potts field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 923, 508 (2017), arXiv:1706.05281 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    R. S. K. Mong, D. J. Clarke, J. Alicea, N. H. Lindner, and P. Fendley, Parafermionic conformal field theory on the lattice, J. Phys. A 47, 452001 (2014), arXiv:1406.0846 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [45]

    S. R. Coleman, R. Jackiw, and L. Susskind, Charge Shielding and Quark Confinement in the Massive Schwinger Model, An- nals Phys. 93, 267 (1975)

    work page 1975

  46. [46]

    Banks, L

    T. Banks, L. Susskind, and J. Kogut, Strong-coupling calcula- tions of lattice gauge theories: (1 + 1)-dimensional exercises, Phys. Rev. D 13, 1043 (1976)

    work page 1976

  47. [47]

    Jurdjevic,Geometric Control Theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 1997)

    V . Jurdjevic,Geometric Control Theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 1997)

    work page 1997

  48. [48]

    M. A. Nielsen, A geometric approach to quantum circuit lower bounds (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0502070 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  49. [49]

    M. A. Nielsen, M. R. Dowling, M. Gu, and A. C. Doherty, Quantum computation as geometry, Science 311, 1133 (2006)

    work page 2006

  50. [50]

    M. R. Dowling and M. A. Nielsen, The geometry of quantum computation (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0701004 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006