Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MAO: A Framework for Process Model Generation with Multi-Agent Orchestration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.01916 v2 pith:W3JGWZUQ submitted 2024-08-04 cs.AI cs.SE

classification cs.AIcs.SE
keywords processmodelsmodelframeworkmodelingmulti-agentagentsefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Process models are frequently used in software engineering to describe business requirements, guide software testing and control system improvement. However, traditional process modeling methods often require the participation of numerous experts, which is expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, the exploration of a more efficient and cost-effective automated modeling method has emerged as a focal point in current research. This article explores a framework for automatically generating process models with multi-agent orchestration (MAO), aiming to enhance the efficiency of process modeling and offer valuable insights for domain experts. Our framework MAO leverages large language models as the cornerstone for multi-agent, employing an innovative prompt strategy to ensure efficient collaboration among multi-agent. Specifically, 1) generation. The first phase of MAO is to generate a slightly rough process model from the text description; 2) refinement. The agents would continuously refine the initial process model through multiple rounds of dialogue; 3) reviewing. Large language models are prone to hallucination phenomena among multi-turn dialogues, so the agents need to review and repair semantic hallucinations in process models; 4) testing. The representation of process models is diverse. Consequently, the agents utilize external tools to test whether the generated process model contains format errors, namely format hallucinations, and then adjust the process model to conform to the output paradigm. The experiments demonstrate that the process models generated by our framework outperform existing methods and surpass manual modeling by 89%, 61%, 52%, and 75% on four different datasets, respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Generalist LLMs: Specialist Agentic Systems for Structured Code Workflow Execution

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A specialist BPMN-to-agent pipeline beats general-purpose coding agents on tool-use accuracy, latency, and token cost for deterministic business workflows.

  2. What is the Best Process Model Representation? A Comparative Analysis for Process Modeling with Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new dataset and head-to-head comparison of nine process model representations with LLMs finds Mermaid best for general use and BPMN text best for generation.

  3. BetaWeb: Towards a Blockchain-enabled Trustworthy Agentic Web

    cs.MA 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    BetaWeb promises a blockchain-enabled trustworthy agentic web, but the submitted manuscript body is a different mining-robot paper, leaving the proposal without supporting evidence.

  4. Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A position paper defines the Agentic Web as the next web era and proposes a three-dimensional conceptual framework for understanding and building it.

Pith tools