Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

An Evaluation of Requirements Modeling for Cyber-Physical Systems via LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.02450 v1 pith:25WS33IR submitted 2024-08-05 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords cpssrequirementsllmsmodelinglanguageproblemdocumentsnatural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Cyber-physical systems (CPSs) integrate cyber and physical components and enable them to interact with each other to meet user needs. The needs for CPSs span rich application domains such as healthcare and medicine, smart home, smart building, etc. This indicates that CPSs are all about solving real-world problems. With the increasing abundance of sensing devices and effectors, the problems wanted to solve with CPSs are becoming more and more complex. It is also becoming increasingly difficult to extract and express CPS requirements accurately. Problem frame approach aims to shape real-world problems by capturing the characteristics and interconnections of components, where the problem diagram is central to expressing the requirements. CPSs requirements are generally presented in domain-specific documents that are normally expressed in natural language. There is currently no effective way to extract problem diagrams from natural language documents. CPSs requirements extraction and modeling are generally done manually, which is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and error-prone. Large language models (LLMs) have shown excellent performance in natural language understanding. It can be interesting to explore the abilities of LLMs to understand domain-specific documents and identify modeling elements, which this paper is working on. To achieve this goal, we first formulate two tasks (i.e., entity recognition and interaction extraction) and propose a benchmark called CPSBench. Based on this benchmark, extensive experiments are conducted to evaluate the abilities and limitations of seven advanced LLMs. We find some interesting insights. Finally, we establish a taxonomy of LLMs hallucinations in CPSs requirements modeling using problem diagrams. These results will inspire research on the use of LLMs for automated CPSs requirements modeling.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. UserTrace: User-Level Requirements Generation and Traceability Recovery from Software Project Repositories

    cs.SE 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UserTrace generates user-level requirements from code repositories and recovers live trace links from requirements to implementation, with evaluations suggesting gains over summarization and traceability baselines.

  2. iReDev: A Knowledge-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Intelligent Requirements Development

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A knowledge-driven, event-triggered multi-agent framework called iReDev generates software requirements artifacts that outperform zero-shot prompting, MetaGPT, and Elicitron on ten small projects.

  3. Automatic Multi-level Feature Tree Construction for Domain-Specific Reusable Artifacts Management

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FTBUILDER automatically constructs hierarchical feature trees for software artifact libraries using embeddings, clustering, and LLM summarization.

  4. MAAD: Automate Software Architecture Design through Knowledge-Driven Multi-Agent Collaboration

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-agent LLM framework generates software architecture designs and evaluation reports from requirements, claimed to outperform MetaGPT on architectural completeness.

  5. Knowledge-Guided Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Requirements Development: A Vision

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper describes KGMAF, a six-agent LLM-based framework for automated requirements development, and reports a preliminary case study on an insurance management system.

Pith tools