Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

LLMs can Schedule

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.06993 v1 pith:WB7RSRPS submitted 2024-08-13 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords jsspllmsneuralschedulingwhileachieveadvancementsallocating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The job shop scheduling problem (JSSP) remains a significant hurdle in optimizing production processes. This challenge involves efficiently allocating jobs to a limited number of machines while minimizing factors like total processing time or job delays. While recent advancements in artificial intelligence have yielded promising solutions, such as reinforcement learning and graph neural networks, this paper explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) for JSSP. We introduce the very first supervised 120k dataset specifically designed to train LLMs for JSSP. Surprisingly, our findings demonstrate that LLM-based scheduling can achieve performance comparable to other neural approaches. Furthermore, we propose a sampling method that enhances the effectiveness of LLMs in tackling JSSP.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Guiding Large Language Models with Genetic Programming-Evolved Heuristic Knowledge for Dynamic Multi-Mode Project Scheduling

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GP-evolved priority rules, injected as feature restrictions or explicit rules, improve LLM project-scheduling decisions, token efficiency, and decision stability compared with unguided prompting.

  2. PowerAtlas: Towards Electricity-Computing Co-Scheduling for Power Systems

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SFT plus feasibility-aware GRPO lets 3B LLMs produce electricity–computing co-schedules that are far more grid-feasible and cheaper than untrained or frontier zero-shot baselines on ECBench.

  3. GOAL: Graph-based Objective-Aligned Diffusion Solvers for Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimization

    cs.NE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GOAL uses conditioned diffusion on relational graphs with typed edges to produce feasible multi-objective solutions for scheduling problems, reporting 100% feasibility and sub-0.2% MAPE on FSP, JSP, and FJSP up to 20 jobs.

  4. HMACE: Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Collaborative Evolution for Combinatorial Optimization

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    HMACE deploys Proposer, Generator, Evaluator, and Reflector agents in an evolutionary loop to generate and refine heuristics for NP-hard problems, reporting lower optimality gaps and token costs than baselines on TSP ...

  5. An Agentic AI Framework with Large Language Models and Chain-of-Thought for UAV-Assisted Logistics Scheduling with Mobile Edge Computing

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    An agentic AI framework with LLMs generates formulations for coupled UAV product collection and MEC task scheduling, solved by hierarchical PPO that reaches 99.6% collection success and 100% deadline compliance in sim...

  6. MAFIG: Multi-agent Driven Formal Instruction Generation Framework

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    MAFIG uses a Perception Agent and Emergency Decision Agent plus span-focused local distillation to let lightweight models rapidly generate formal instructions that fix local scheduling failures, achieving over 94% suc...

  7. A Systematic Survey on Large Language Models for Evolutionary Optimization: From Modeling to Solving

    cs.NE 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A literature survey that classifies LLM-based optimization research into modeling and solving, with solving divided into LLMs as optimizers, low-level components, and high-level managers.

Pith tools