Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Guide to Similarity Measures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.07706 v1 pith:PEMBCWPU submitted 2024-08-07 cs.IR cs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.CVcs.LG
keywords measuressimilarityapplicationfindguidemeasurenon-expertsassortment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Similarity measures play a central role in various data science application domains for a wide assortment of tasks. This guide describes a comprehensive set of prevalent similarity measures to serve both non-experts and professional. Non-experts that wish to understand the motivation for a measure as well as how to use it may find a friendly and detailed exposition of the formulas of the measures, whereas experts may find a glance to the principles of designing similarity measures and ideas for a better way to measure similarity for their desired task in a given application domain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptable Embeddings Network (AEN)

    cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    AEN compares a statement embedding against per-dimension kernel density estimates of condition token embeddings, reporting F1 0.74 on synthetic data with roughly 16x fewer FLOPs than a 3B-parameter LLM.

Pith tools