Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Beyond the Hype: A dispassionate look at vision-language models in medical scenario

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.08704 v2 pith:MAQCKNRU submitted 2024-08-16 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords lvlmsmodelsvisualcapabilitiesquantitativeradvuqaacrossanswering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks, garnering significant attention in AI communities. However, their performance and reliability in specialized domains such as medicine remain insufficiently assessed. In particular, most assessments over-concentrate on evaluating VLMs based on simple Visual Question Answering (VQA) on multi-modality data, while ignoring the in-depth characteristics of LVLMs. In this study, we introduce RadVUQA, a novel Radiological Visual Understanding and Question Answering benchmark, to comprehensively evaluate existing LVLMs. RadVUQA mainly validates LVLMs across five dimensions: 1) Anatomical understanding, assessing the models' ability to visually identify biological structures; 2) Multimodal comprehension, which involves the capability of interpreting linguistic and visual instructions to produce desired outcomes; 3) Quantitative and spatial reasoning, evaluating the models' spatial awareness and proficiency in combining quantitative analysis with visual and linguistic information; 4) Physiological knowledge, measuring the models' capability to comprehend functions and mechanisms of organs and systems; and 5) Robustness, which assesses the models' capabilities against unharmonized and synthetic data. The results indicate that both generalized LVLMs and medical-specific LVLMs have critical deficiencies with weak multimodal comprehension and quantitative reasoning capabilities. Our findings reveal the large gap between existing LVLMs and clinicians, highlighting the urgent need for more robust and intelligent LVLMs. The code is available at https://github.com/Nandayang/RadVUQA

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MedBLINK: Probing Basic Perception in Multimodal Language Models for Medicine

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Current medical multimodal models, including GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, fail simple perceptual tasks on medical images that human experts solve almost perfectly.

  2. Computed Tomography Visual Question Answering with Cross-modal Feature Graphing

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A cross-modal graph connecting CT slices and question tokens, aggregated by an attentive GCN, improves LLM-based CT visual question answering on M3D-VQA.

Pith tools