Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Developer-Centric Study Exploring Mobile Application Security Practices and Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.09032 v1 pith:4OPBLXB7 submitted 2024-08-16 cs.CR cs.SE

classification cs.CRcs.SE
keywords securitymobilepracticesappsdeveloperschallengesdeveloper-centricface
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Mobile applications (apps) have become an essential part of everyday life, offering convenient access to services such as banking, healthcare, and shopping. With these apps handling sensitive personal and financial data, ensuring their security is paramount. While previous research has explored mobile app developer practices, there is limited knowledge about the common practices and challenges that developers face in securing their apps. Our study addresses this need through a global survey of 137 experienced mobile app developers, providing a developer-centric view of mobile app security. Our findings show that developers place high importance on security, frequently implementing features such as authentication and secure storage. They face challenges with managing vulnerabilities, permissions, and privacy concerns, and often rely on resources like Stack Overflow for help. Many developers find that existing learning materials do not adequately prepare them to build secure apps and provide recommendations, such as following best practices and integrating security at the beginning of the development process. We envision our findings leading to improved security practices, better-designed tools and resources, and more effective training programs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools