REVIEW 2 cited by
The curse of random quantum data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Quantum machine learning, which involves running machine learning algorithms on quantum devices, may be one of the most significant flagship applications for these devices. Unlike its classical counterparts, the role of data in quantum machine learning has not been fully understood. In this work, we quantify the performances of quantum machine learning in the landscape of quantum data. Provided that the encoding of quantum data is sufficiently random, the performance, we find that the training efficiency and generalization capabilities in quantum machine learning will be exponentially suppressed with the increase in the number of qubits, which we call "the curse of random quantum data". Our findings apply to both the quantum kernel method and the large-width limit of quantum neural networks. Conversely, we highlight that through meticulous design of quantum datasets, it is possible to avoid these curses, thereby achieving efficient convergence and robust generalization. Our conclusions are corroborated by extensive numerical simulations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Stochastic Pauli-path simulator for large-scale quantum optimization
A stochastic Pauli-path simulator with importance reweighting and path automatic differentiation produces unbiased gradient estimates for quantum optimization, demonstrated on VQE at 100 qubits and QNN at 40 qubits.
-
Quantum Machine Learning: A Hands-on Tutorial for Machine Learning Practitioners and Researchers
A structured tutorial that introduces quantum machine learning concepts, algorithms, theory, and PennyLane code to classical ML practitioners.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.