REVIEW 2 cited by
MGH Radiology Llama: A Llama 3 70B Model for Radiology
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In recent years, the field of radiology has increasingly harnessed the power of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance diagnostic accuracy, streamline workflows, and improve patient care. Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as particularly promising tools, offering significant potential in assisting radiologists with report generation, clinical decision support, and patient communication. This paper presents an advanced radiology-focused large language model: MGH Radiology Llama. It is developed using the Llama 3 70B model, building upon previous domain-specific models like Radiology-GPT and Radiology-Llama2. Leveraging a unique and comprehensive dataset from Massachusetts General Hospital, comprising over 6.5 million de-identified medical reports across various imaging modalities, the model demonstrates significant improvements in generating accurate and clinically relevant radiology impressions given the corresponding findings. Our evaluation, incorporating both traditional metrics and a GPT-4-based assessment, highlights the enhanced performance of this work over general-purpose LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Leveraging Geolocation in Clinical Records to Improve Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis Using DMV Framework
Adding geolocation to LLM embeddings is claimed to improve Alzheimer's risk prediction, but the target is a CDC aggregate value and the near-zero error suggests label memorization.
-
Legal Evalutions and Challenges of Large Language Models
In a small human-scored evaluation of 10 LLMs on 26 legal cases, o1-preview received the highest overall human score (3.96/5), while ROUGE and BLEU scores did not track human preference.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.