Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Multilevel Interpretability Of Artificial Neural Networks: Leveraging Framework And Methods From Neuroscience

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.12664 v2 pith:3WTMG6RB submitted 2024-08-22 cs.AI q-bio.NC

classification cs.AIq-bio.NC
keywords neuralartificialsystemsbehaviorbiologicaltoolsanalysisanalyzing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As deep learning systems are scaled up to many billions of parameters, relating their internal structure to external behaviors becomes very challenging. Although daunting, this problem is not new: Neuroscientists and cognitive scientists have accumulated decades of experience analyzing a particularly complex system - the brain. In this work, we argue that interpreting both biological and artificial neural systems requires analyzing those systems at multiple levels of analysis, with different analytic tools for each level. We first lay out a joint grand challenge among scientists who study the brain and who study artificial neural networks: understanding how distributed neural mechanisms give rise to complex cognition and behavior. We then present a series of analytical tools that can be used to analyze biological and artificial neural systems, organizing those tools according to Marr's three levels of analysis: computation/behavior, algorithm/representation, and implementation. Overall, the multilevel interpretability framework provides a principled way to tackle neural system complexity; links structure, computation, and behavior; clarifies assumptions and research priorities at each level; and paves the way toward a unified effort for understanding intelligent systems, may they be biological or artificial.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncovering a Universal Abstract Algorithm for Modular Addition in Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Trained MLPs and transformers solving modular addition can be unified under an approximate Chinese Remainder Theorem, and deep or embedding-based networks learn only O(log n) frequency features.

  2. Representation biases: will we achieve complete understanding by analyzing representations?

    q-bio.NC 2025-07 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    Feature representation biases in trained models can distort PCA, regression, RSA, and model-brain comparisons, so representational analyses may not reveal all of a system's computations.

Pith tools