REVIEW 3 cited by
Claim Verification in the Age of Large Language Models: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The large and ever-increasing amount of data available on the Internet coupled with the laborious task of manual claim and fact verification has sparked the interest in the development of automated claim verification systems. Several deep learning and transformer-based models have been proposed for this task over the years. With the introduction of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their superior performance in several NLP tasks, we have seen a surge of LLM-based approaches to claim verification along with the use of novel methods such as Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). In this survey, we present a comprehensive account of recent claim verification frameworks using LLMs. We describe the different components of the claim verification pipeline used in these frameworks in detail including common approaches to retrieval, prompting, and fine-tuning. Finally, we describe publicly available English datasets created for this task.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Characterizing Deep Research: A Benchmark and Formal Definition
Deep research is characterized by high search and reasoning intensity; the new LiveDRBench measures claim-level precision and recall, where the best current model scores 0.55 F1.
-
When Scale Meets Diversity: Evaluating Language Models on Fine-Grained Multilingual Claim Verification
A 270M-parameter encoder model (XLM-R) achieves 57.7% macro-F1 on the X-Fact multilingual claim verification benchmark, beating the best tested 7-12B LLM (16.9%) and the prior state of the art (41.9%).
-
The Next Phase of Scientific Fact-Checking: Advanced Evidence Retrieval from Complex Structured Academic Papers
The paper proposes a full-paper, evidence-aware retrieval agenda for scientific fact-checking and shows that combining verification feedback with semantic reranking improves evidence recall on SciFact-Open and Check-COVID.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.