Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Claim Verification in the Age of Large Language Models: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.14317 v2 pith:UIQHDD3P submitted 2024-08-26 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords claimverificationlargemodelstaskapproachesavailabledescribe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The large and ever-increasing amount of data available on the Internet coupled with the laborious task of manual claim and fact verification has sparked the interest in the development of automated claim verification systems. Several deep learning and transformer-based models have been proposed for this task over the years. With the introduction of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their superior performance in several NLP tasks, we have seen a surge of LLM-based approaches to claim verification along with the use of novel methods such as Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). In this survey, we present a comprehensive account of recent claim verification frameworks using LLMs. We describe the different components of the claim verification pipeline used in these frameworks in detail including common approaches to retrieval, prompting, and fine-tuning. Finally, we describe publicly available English datasets created for this task.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Characterizing Deep Research: A Benchmark and Formal Definition

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Deep research is characterized by high search and reasoning intensity; the new LiveDRBench measures claim-level precision and recall, where the best current model scores 0.55 F1.

  2. When Scale Meets Diversity: Evaluating Language Models on Fine-Grained Multilingual Claim Verification

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 270M-parameter encoder model (XLM-R) achieves 57.7% macro-F1 on the X-Fact multilingual claim verification benchmark, beating the best tested 7-12B LLM (16.9%) and the prior state of the art (41.9%).

  3. The Next Phase of Scientific Fact-Checking: Advanced Evidence Retrieval from Complex Structured Academic Papers

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a full-paper, evidence-aware retrieval agenda for scientific fact-checking and shows that combining verification feedback with semantic reranking improves evidence recall on SciFact-Open and Check-COVID.

Pith tools