Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Interpretable Clustering: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.00743 v4 pith:XCVMIHTO submitted 2024-09-01 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords clusteringalgorithmsmethodsinterpretabledecisionsexplainableneedsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, much of the research on clustering algorithms has primarily focused on enhancing their accuracy and efficiency, frequently at the expense of interpretability. However, as these methods are increasingly being applied in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems, the need of transparent and interpretable clustering outcomes has become a critical concern. This is not only necessary for gaining user trust but also for satisfying the growing ethical and regulatory demands in these fields. Ensuring that decisions derived from clustering algorithms can be clearly understood and justified is now a fundamental requirement. To address this need, this paper provides a comprehensive and structured review of the current state of explainable clustering algorithms, identifying key criteria to distinguish between various methods. These insights can effectively assist researchers in making informed decisions about the most suitable explainable clustering methods for specific application contexts, while also promoting the development and adoption of clustering algorithms that are both efficient and transparent. For convenient access and reference, an open repository organizes representative and emerging interpretable clustering methods under the taxonomy proposed in this survey, available at https://hulianyu.xyz/Interpretable-Clustering-Repository

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Differentially Private Explanations for Clusters

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    DPClustX privately selects the most informative attributes for each cluster and releases noisy histograms only for those attributes, providing differentially private explanations of clustering results.

  2. Interpretable Clustering Ensemble

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ICE builds an interpretable decision tree for clustering ensemble by splitting on original features to maximize summed chi-squared agreement with base k-means partitions.

Pith tools