REVIEW 2 cited by
Towards Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Medical Q&A Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper explores the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the evaluation of responses in medical Question and Answer (Q\&A) systems, a crucial form of Natural Language Processing. Traditionally, human evaluation has been indispensable for assessing the quality of these responses. However, manual evaluation by medical professionals is time-consuming and costly. Our study examines whether LLMs can reliably replicate human evaluations by using questions derived from patient data, thereby saving valuable time for medical experts. While the findings suggest promising results, further research is needed to address more specific or complex questions that were beyond the scope of this initial investigation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ClinBench-HPB: A Clinical Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Diseases
A new benchmark covering all ICD-10 HPB disease categories shows that LLMs, including specialized medical models, perform far worse on real clinical cases than on exam-style questions.
-
LaQual: An Automated Framework for LLM App Quality Evaluation
LaQual automates LLM app-store quality evaluation through scenario classification, static indicator filtering, and LLM-generated dynamic metrics, with Spearman correlations of about 0.6 against human ratings.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.