Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

State Dependent Spread Complexity Dynamics in Many-Body Localization Transition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.02186 v1 pith:2LKBIIUJ submitted 2024-09-03 cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.str-elhep-thquant-ph

classification cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.str-elhep-thquant-ph
keywords complexityspreaddynamicsintegrablephasetransitionkrylovmany-body
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We characterize the Many-Body Localization (MBL) phase transition using the dynamics of spread complexity and inverse participation ratio in the Krylov space starting from different initial states. Our analysis of the disordered Heisenberg spin-1/2 chain unravels that the ergodic-to-MBL transition can be determined from the transition of the pre-saturation peak in the thermofield double state (TFD) spread complexity. On the other hand, if an initially ordered state or a superposition of a small number of such states is chosen, then the saturation value of spread complexity and Krylov inverse participation ratio (KIPR) can distinguish the ergodic phase from the integrable phases, with no sharp difference between the integrable phases. Interestingly, the distinction between the disorder-free integrable and the MBL integrable phase is established by the spread complexity study of random states chosen from unitary and orthogonal Haar ensembles. We also study the complexity dynamics by coupling the system to a bath, which shows distinctive profiles in different phases. A stretched exponential decay of KIPR is observed when the MBL system is connected to the bath, with the decay starting at an earlier time for a greater value of environmental dephasing. Our work sheds light on the efficacy of Krylov space dynamics in understanding phase transitions in quantum many-body systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Krylov-space anatomy and spread complexity of a disordered quantum spin chain

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Krylov spread complexity scales as N_H (ergodic) versus N_H^α with α<1 (MBL), with stretched-exponential Krylov profiles dominated by a vanishing fraction of resonant eigenstates.

  2. Spread Complexity in Non-Hermitian Many-Body Localization Transition

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Singular value spread complexity and TFD-state spread complexity give new numerical order parameters for the non-Hermitian many-body localization transition.

  3. Higher-Order Krylov State Complexity in Random Matrix Quenches

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Higher-order generalized spread complexities show a more pronounced pre-equilibration peak than standard spread complexity in random matrix quenches, quantifying chaos more sharply up to third order.

  4. Statistics and Complexity of Wavefunction Spreading in Quantum Dynamical Systems

    quant-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The moments of the spreading-operator measurement distribution are generalized spread complexities, which for GUE Hamiltonians peak more sharply at higher order and obey a norm bound.

Pith tools