Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neural Algorithmic Reasoning with Multiple Correct Solutions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.06953 v4 pith:NWOIUHOC submitted 2024-09-11 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords algorithmsmethodneuralsolutionsalgorithmiccorrectmultiplereasoning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural Algorithmic Reasoning (NAR) extends classical algorithms to higher dimensional data. However, canonical implementations of NAR train neural networks to return only a single solution, even when there are multiple correct solutions to a problem, such as single-source shortest paths. For some applications, it is desirable to recover more than one correct solution. To that end, we give the first method for NAR with multiple solutions. We demonstrate our method on two classical algorithms: Bellman-Ford (BF) and Depth-First Search (DFS), favouring deeper insight into two algorithms over a broader survey of algorithms. This method involves generating appropriate training data as well as sampling and validating solutions from model output. Each step of our method, which can serve as a framework for neural algorithmic reasoning beyond the tasks presented in this paper, might be of independent interest to the field and our results represent the first attempt at this task in the NAR literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Primal-Dual Neural Algorithmic Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A GNN framework that simulates primal-dual approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems and, with small-instance optimal labels, can beat the algorithm it learns.

Pith tools