Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Cross-Refine: Improving Natural Language Explanation Generation by Learning in Tandem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.07123 v2 pith:PZ5RZHVX submitted 2024-09-11 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords cross-refinellmsexplanationslanguagenlesself-refineautomaticcritic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Natural language explanations (NLEs) are vital for elucidating the reasoning behind large language model (LLM) decisions. Many techniques have been developed to generate NLEs using LLMs. However, like humans, LLMs might not always produce optimal NLEs on first attempt. Inspired by human learning processes, we introduce Cross-Refine, which employs role modeling by deploying two LLMs as generator and critic, respectively. The generator outputs a first NLE and then refines this initial explanation using feedback and suggestions provided by the critic. Cross-Refine does not require any supervised training data or additional training. We validate Cross-Refine across three NLP tasks using three state-of-the-art open-source LLMs through automatic and human evaluation. We select Self-Refine (Madaan et al., 2023) as the baseline, which only utilizes self-feedback to refine the explanations. Our findings from automatic evaluation and a user study indicate that Cross-Refine outperforms Self-Refine. Meanwhile, Cross-Refine can perform effectively with less powerful LLMs, whereas Self-Refine only yields strong results with ChatGPT. Additionally, we conduct an ablation study to assess the importance of feedback and suggestions. Both of them play an important role in refining explanations. We further evaluate Cross-Refine on a bilingual dataset in English and German.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Self-Critique and Refinement for Faithful Natural Language Explanations

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A self-critique and refinement framework with word-level feedback cuts unfaithfulness rates in LLM explanations by about 19 points on average, but gains may partly reflect the word-presence evaluation metric.

Pith tools