REVIEW 2 cited by
Towards certifiable AI in aviation: landscape, challenges, and opportunities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods are powerful tools for various domains, including critical fields such as avionics, where certification is required to achieve and maintain an acceptable level of safety. General solutions for safety-critical systems must address three main questions: Is it suitable? What drives the system's decisions? Is it robust to errors/attacks? This is more complex in AI than in traditional methods. In this context, this paper presents a comprehensive mind map of formal AI certification in avionics. It highlights the challenges of certifying AI development with an example to emphasize the need for qualification beyond performance metrics.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Approach Towards Semi-Automated Certification for Low Criticality ML-Enabled Airborne Applications
A semi-automated certification framework for DO-178C Level D ML systems is demonstrated on a YOLOv8 vehicle detector, producing a Moderate Assurance score of 74.7.
-
Enhancing Interpretability Through Loss-Defined Classification Objective in Structured Latent Spaces
A weighted sum of cross-entropy and a PCA-condensed, per-cluster-variance Magnet loss with dynamic alpha and beta schedules improves accuracy and latent cluster quality on three image benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.