Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AIPO: Improving Training Objective for Iterative Preference Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.08845 v1 pith:HZ73IXWS submitted 2024-09-13 cs.CL

AIPO: Improving Training Objective for Iterative Preference Optimization

classification cs.CL
keywords optimizationiterativepreferenceaiposynthetictrainingaligningdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Preference Optimization (PO), is gaining popularity as an alternative choice of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs). Recent research on aligning LLMs iteratively with synthetic or partially synthetic data shows promising results in scaling up PO training for both academic settings and proprietary trained models such as Llama3. Despite its success, our study shows that the length exploitation issue present in PO is even more severe in Iterative Preference Optimization (IPO) due to the iterative nature of the process. In this work, we study iterative preference optimization with synthetic data. We share the findings and analysis along the way of building the iterative preference optimization pipeline. More specifically, we discuss the length exploitation issue during iterative preference optimization and propose our training objective for iterative preference optimization, namely Agreement-aware Iterative Preference Optimization (AIPO). To demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, we conduct comprehensive experiments and achieve state-of-the-art performance on MT-Bench, AlpacaEval 2.0, and Arena-Hard. Our implementation and model checkpoints will be made available at https://github.com/bytedance/AIPO.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Antigen-specific Antibody Multi-modal Foundation Model for Functional Antibody Design

    q-bio.BM 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0

    AAMFM combines ESM3, an antigen-geometry adapter, and Cal-DPO preference optimization rewarded by AlphaFold3-style scores to design antibody CDRs and structures, reporting higher predicted binding scores than prior methods.

  2. TPMM-DPO: Trajectory-aware Preference-guided Model Merging for Iterative Direct Preference Optimization

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TPMM-DPO applies trajectory-aware learned-weight merging of prior policy models to stabilize iterative DPO against preference noise accumulation.