Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Understanding posterior projection effects with normalizing flows

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.09101 v1 pith:XG6GBGYO submitted 2024-09-13 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.CO

Understanding posterior projection effects with normalizing flows

classification astro-ph.IM astro-ph.CO
keywords distributionsposteriorcosmologyaccurateavailablebayesianeffectserror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Many modern applications of Bayesian inference, such as in cosmology, are based on complicated forward models with high-dimensional parameter spaces. This considerably limits the sampling of posterior distributions conditioned on observed data. In turn, this reduces the interpretability of posteriors to their one- and two-dimensional marginal distributions, when more information is available in the full dimensional distributions. We show how to learn smooth and differentiable representations of posterior distributions from their samples using normalizing flows, which we train with an added evidence error loss term, to improve accuracy in multiple ways. Motivated by problems from cosmology, we implement a robust method to obtain one and two-dimensional posterior profiles. These are obtained by optimizing, instead of integrating, over other parameters, and are thus less prone than marginals to so-called projection effects. We also demonstrate how this representation provides an accurate estimator of the Bayesian evidence, with log error at the 0.2 level, allowing accurate model comparison. We test our method on multi-modal mixtures of Gaussians up to dimension 32 before applying it to simulated cosmology examples. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/mraveri/tensiometer.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. First measurement of the Hubble constant from a combined weak lensing and gravitational-wave standard siren analysis

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Joint analysis of LVK standard sirens and DES 3x2pt data yields H0 = 67.9 +4.4/-4.3 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} at 6.4% precision while tightening the Omega_m constraint by 22%.

  2. Machine Learning Assisted Parameter-Space Searches for Lensed Gravitational Waves

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    Normalizing flow based non-Gaussian consistency tests in a compressed detector basis select GW170104-GW170814 as the only promising lensed pair in GWTC-3.