Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards Data Contamination Detection for Modern Large Language Models: Limitations, Inconsistencies, and Oracle Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.09927 v2 pith:NTHOJ7F6 submitted 2024-09-16 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords contaminationdetectionllmsdataapproachesbenchmarkschallengingevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As large language models achieve increasingly impressive results, questions arise about whether such performance is from generalizability or mere data memorization. Thus, numerous data contamination detection methods have been proposed. However, these approaches are often validated with traditional benchmarks and early-stage LLMs, leaving uncertainty about their effectiveness when evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs on the contamination of more challenging benchmarks. To address this gap and provide a dual investigation of SOTA LLM contamination status and detection method robustness, we evaluate five contamination detection approaches with four state-of-the-art LLMs across eight challenging datasets often used in modern LLM evaluation. Our analysis reveals that (1) Current methods have non-trivial limitations in their assumptions and practical applications; (2) Notable difficulties exist in detecting contamination introduced during instruction fine-tuning with answer augmentation; and (3) Limited consistencies between SOTA contamination detection techniques. These findings highlight the complexity of contamination detection in advanced LLMs and the urgent need for further research on robust and generalizable contamination evaluation. Our code is available at https://github.com/vsamuel2003/data-contamination.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Simulating Training Data Leakage in Multiple-Choice Benchmarks for LLM Evaluation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under simulated leakage, n-gram-based detection beats permutation and truncation methods, and cleaning flag-prone MMLU instances changes model rankings only slightly.

  2. LLM Performance for Code Generation on Noisy Tasks

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs solve heavily obfuscated benchmark tasks, and performance decay under obfuscation differs sharply between old and new datasets, which the authors interpret as a signature of training-data contamination.

Pith tools